Reminder to 0bama and Holder Employees

COMPUTER TRESPASS---RCW 9A.52.110---Computer trespass in the first degree.

(1) A person is guilty of computer trespass in the first degree if the person, without authorization, intentionally gains access to a computer system or electronic database of another; and (a) The access is made with the intent to commit another crime; or (b) The violation involves a computer or database maintained by a government agency.

(2) Computer trespass in the first degree is a class C felony.

National Debt Counter -- Thank the Stimulus Bill

You Are Never As Anonymous As You Think!

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts

Please Be Sure to Scroll Down to See Political Videos and Permanent Comments Located At Bottom Of This Page. Thank you.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

How Barack Obama Influenced Bad Mortgages OR "What a Community Organizer Does"

O'S DANGEROUS PALS
BARACK'S 'ORGANIZER' BUDS PUSHED FOR BAD MORTGAGES



By STANLEY KURTZ
Chutzpah: ACORN's drive to lower mortgage standards paved the way for the meltdown - yet last week, it was holding protests like this one in Florida, trying to get a cut of the financial-market-rescue bill.


Posted: 3:53 am
September 29, 2008


WHAT exactly does a "community organizer" do? Barack Obama's rise has left many Americans asking themselves that question. Here's a big part of the answer: Community organizers intimidate banks into making high-risk loans to customers with poor credit.


In the name of fairness to minorities, community organizers occupy private offices, chant inside bank lobbies, and confront executives at their homes - and thereby force financial institutions to direct hundreds of millions of dollars in mortgages to low-credit customers.


In other words, community organizers help to undermine the US economy by pushing the banking system into a sinkhole of bad loans. And Obama has spent years training and funding the organizers who do it.


THE seeds of today's financial meltdown lie in the Community Reinvestment Act - a law passed in 1977 and made riskier by unwise amendments and regulatory rulings in later decades.


CRA was meant to encourage banks to make loans to high-risk borrowers, often minorities living in unstable neighborhoods. That has provided an opening to radical groups like ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) to abuse the law by forcing banks to make hundreds of millions of dollars in "subprime" loans to often uncreditworthy poor and minority customers.


Any bank that wants to expand or merge with another has to show it has complied with CRA - and approval can be held up by complaints filed by groups like ACORN.


In fact, intimidation tactics, public charges of racism and threats to use CRA to block business expansion have enabled ACORN to extract hundreds of millions of dollars in loans and contributions from America's financial institutions.


Banks already overexposed by these shaky loans were pushed still further in the wrong direction when government-sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac began buying up their bad loans and offering them for sale on world markets.


Fannie and Freddie acted in response to Clinton administration pressure to boost homeownership rates among minorities and the poor. However compassionate the motive, the result of this systematic disregard for normal credit standards has been financial disaster.


ONE key pioneer of ACORN's subprime-loan shakedown racket was Madeline Talbott - an activist with extensive ties to Barack Obama. She was also in on the ground floor of the disastrous turn in Fannie Mae's mortgage policies.


Long the director of Chicago ACORN, Talbott is a specialist in "direct action" - organizers' term for their militant tactics of intimidation and disruption. Perhaps her most famous stunt was leading a group of ACORN protesters breaking into a meeting of the Chicago City Council to push for a "living wage" law, shouting in defiance as she was arrested for mob action and disorderly conduct. But her real legacy may be her drive to push banks into making risky mortgage loans.


In February 1990, Illinois regulators held what was believed to be the first-ever state hearing to consider blocking a thrift merger for lack of compliance with CRA. The challenge was filed by ACORN, led by Talbott. Officials of Bell Federal Savings and Loan Association, her target, complained that ACORN pressure was undermining its ability to meet strict financial requirements it was obligated to uphold and protested being boxed into an "affirmative-action lending policy." The following years saw Talbott featured in dozens of news stories about pressuring banks into higher-risk minority loans.


IN April 1992, Talbott filed an other precedent-setting com plaint using the "community support requirements" of the 1989 savings-and-loan bailout, this time against Avondale Federal Bank for Savings. Within a month, Chicago ACORN had organized its first "bank fair" at Malcolm X College and found 16 Chicago-area financial institutions willing to participate.


Two months later, aided by ACORN organizer Sandra Maxwell, Talbott announced plans to conduct demonstrations in the lobbies of area banks that refused to attend an ACORN-sponsored national bank "summit" in New York. She insisted that banks show a commitment to minority lending by lowering their standards on downpayments and underwriting - for example, by overlooking bad credit histories.


By September 1992, The Chicago Tribune was describing Talbott's program as "affirma- tive-action lending" and ACORN was issuing fact sheets bragging about relaxations of credit standards that it had won on behalf of minorities.


And Talbott continued her effort to, as she put it, drag banks "kicking and screaming" into high-risk loans. A September 1993 story in The Chicago Sun-Times presents her as the leader of an initiative in which five area financial institutions (including two of her former targets, now plainly cowed - Bell Federal Savings and Avondale Federal Savings) were "participating in a $55 million national pilot program with affordable-housing group ACORN to make mortgages for low- and moderate-income people with troubled credit histories."


What made this program different from others, the paper added, was the participation of Fannie Mae - which had agreed to buy up the loans. "If this pilot program works," crowed Talbott, "it will send a message to the lending community that it's OK to make these kind of loans."


Well, the pilot program "worked," and Fannie Mae's message that risky loans to minorities were "OK" was sent. The rest is financial-meltdown history.


IT would be tough to find an "on the ground" community organizer more closely tied to the subprime-mortgage fiasco than Madeline Talbott. And no one has been more supportive of Madeline Talbott than Barack Obama.


When Obama was just a budding community organizer in Chicago, Talbott was so impressed that she asked him to train her personal staff.


He returned to Chicago in the early '90s, just as Talbott was starting her pressure campaign on local banks. Chicago ACORN sought out Obama's legal services for a "motor voter" case and partnered with him on his 1992 "Project VOTE" registration drive.


In those years, he also conducted leadership-training seminars for ACORN's up-and-coming organizers. That is, Obama was training the army of ACORN organizers who participated in Madeline Talbott's drive against Chicago's banks.


More than that, Obama was funding them. As he rose to a leadership role at Chicago's Woods Fund, he became the most powerful voice on the foundation's board for supporting ACORN and other community organizers. In 1995, the Woods Fund substantially expanded its funding of community organizers - and Obama chaired the committee that urged and managed the shift.


That committee's report on strategies for funding groups like ACORN features all the key names in Obama's organizer network. The report quotes Talbott more than any other figure; Sandra Maxwell, Talbott's ACORN ally in the bank battle, was also among the organizers consulted.


MORE, the Obama-supervised Woods Fund report ac knowledges the problem of getting donors and foundations to contribute to radical groups like ACORN - whose confrontational tactics often scare off even liberal donors and foundations.


Indeed, the report brags about pulling the wool over the public's eye. The Woods Fund's claim to be "nonideological," it says, has "enabled the Trustees to make grants to organizations that use confrontational tactics against the business and government 'establishments' without undue risk of being criticized for partisanship."


Hmm. Radicalism disguised by a claim to be postideological. Sound familiar?


The Woods Fund report makes it clear Obama was fully aware of the intimidation tactics used by ACORN's Madeline Talbott in her pioneering efforts to force banks to suspend their usual credit standards. Yet he supported Talbott in every conceivable way. He trained her personal staff and other aspiring ACORN leaders, he consulted with her extensively, and he arranged a major boost in foundation funding for her efforts.


And, as the leader of another charity, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, Obama channeled more funding Talbott's way - ostensibly for education projects but surely supportive of ACORN's overall efforts.


In return, Talbott proudly announced her support of Obama's first campaign for state Senate, saying, "We accept and respect him as a kindred spirit, a fellow organizer."


IN short, to understand the roots of the subprime-mort gage crisis, look to ACORN's Madeline Talbott. And to see how Talbott was able to work her mischief, look to Barack Obama.


Then you'll truly know what community organizers do.


Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow with the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, DC.




HOW DID WE EVER GET IN THIS MESS??


"100 percent financing . . ."
"No down payment . . ."
"No income . . .
"No job . . ."
"No assets . . ."
"No credit scores . . ."
"Low credit scores . . ."
"No SSN required . . ."
"ITIN identification accepted . . ."
"Undocumented income . . . even if you don't report it on your tax returns . . ."



BUT WHY WOULD THEY DO THAT??


7.) Unqualified home owners -- not our fault talk to the Banks
6.) Banks -- not our fault talk to Fannie and Freddie
5.) Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac -- not our fault talk to Bush
4.) President Bush -- not my fault talk to Congress
3.) Congress -- not our fault talk to ACORN
2.) ACORN, La Raza -- not our fault talk to Obama
1.) Barack Obama -- Ah . . .
Thank You Panola60

Vouching for your friends

Hey everyone, this is what I was saying about Obama.....where are the friends of neighbors, ex-girlfriends, teachers or even one person that he helped on the Southside as a Community Organizer? Where are they? NO ONE, BUT NO ONE HAS STEPPED UP TO THE PLATE TO VOUCH FOR HIM.




Hillary had college friends and Lynn Rothschild, McCain had other vets that were POW's with him - not to mention many in the congress and senate and past presidents etc. Where are the folks that have a history of Obama.....not folks like John Kerry or Claire McCaskill who have barely known Obama and are vying for "cabinet positions" Where are they?

ENTER GOVERNOR PALIN

Photobucket
Palin: Yes, she's 100 percent Ivy-free.


Posted: 3:26 am
September 20, 2008

I KNOW Sarah Palin, and so does my wife. Neither of us ever actually met the governor of Alaska , but we grew up with her - in the small-town America despised by the leftwing elite.


One gal-pal classmate of my wife's has even traveled from New York 's Finger Lakes to Alaska to hunt moose with her husband. (Got one, too.) And no, Ms. Streisand, she isn't a redneck missing half her teeth - she's a lawyer.


Photobucket

The sneering elites and their mediacrat fellow travelers just don't get it: How on earth could anyone vote for someone who didn't attend an Ivy League school? And having more than 1.7 children marks any woman as a rube. (If Palin had any taste, her teenage daughter would've had a quiet abortion in a discreet facility.
)

And what kind of retro-Barbie would stay happily married to her high-school sweetheart? Ugh. She even kills animals and eats them. (The meat and fish served in the upscale bistros patronized by Obama supporters appears by magic - it didn't really come from living things. . .
)
Palin has that hick accent, too. And that busy-mom beehive 'do. Double ugh! Bet she hasn't even read Ian McEwan's latest novel and can't explain Frank Gehry's vision for a new architecture. She and her blue-collar (triple ugh!) husband don't even own a McMansion, let alone an inherited family compound on the Cape .


And she wants to be vice president?

The opinion-maker elites see Sarah Palin clearly every time they look up from another sneering article in The New Yorker: She's a country-bumpkin chumpette from a hick state with low latte availability. She's not one of them and never will be. That's the real disqualifier in this race.


Photobucket

Now let me tell you what those postmodern bigots with their multiple vacation homes and their disappointing trust-fund kids don't see:

Sarah Palin's one of us. She actually represents the American people.


When The New York Times, CNN, the NBC basket of basket cases and all the barking blog dogs insult Palin, they're insulting us. When they smear her, they're smearing every American who actually works for a living, who doesn't expect a handout, who doesn't have a full-time accountant to parse the family taxes, who believes in the Pledge of Allegiance and who thinks a church is more than just a tedious stop on daughter Emily's 100K wedding day.


Go ahead, faux feminists and Hollywood deep thinkers: Snicker at Sarah America's degree from the University of Idaho, but remember that most Americans didn't attend Harvard or Princeton as a legacy after daddy donated enough to buy his kid's way in.


Go ahead, campaign strategists: Mock Americans who go to church and actually pray. But you might want to run the Census numbers first.

And go right ahead: Dismiss all of us who remember how, on the first day of deer season, our high school classrooms were half empty (not a problem at Andover or Exeter ).


That rube accent of Palin's? It's a howler. But she sounds a lot more like the rest of us than a Harvard man or a Smithie ever will.

Why does Sarah Palin energize all of us who don't belong to the gilded leftwing circle? Because she's us. We sat beside her in class. We hung out after school (might've even shared a backseat combat zone on prom night). And now she lives next door, raising her kids.


Photobucket

For the first time since Ronald Reagan, our last great president, we, the people, see a chance that one of us might have a voice in governing our country.


Speaking of Reagan ( Eureka College , Illinois ), every chief executive we've had since the Gipper snapped his final salute as president has had the imprimatur of an Ivy League university.
And we've gone from bad to worse:

* George Herbert Walker Bush: Yale.

* William Jefferson Clinton: Georgetown , Oxford , Yale Law.

* George W. Bush: Yale and Harvard Business School .


The first lacked the sense to finish the job in Desert Storm; the second lacked the guts to go after al Qaeda when it was just a startup - and the third, well, let's just say he disappointed our low expectations.

Now we have the Ivy League elite's "he's not only like us but he's a minority and we're so wonderful to support him" candidate, Sen. Barack Obama ( Columbia and Harvard Law).


Our country can't afford another one of these clowns. Harvard isn't the answer - Harvard's the problem.


So here's the message Palin is sending on behalf of the rest of us (the down-market masses Dems love at election time and ignore once the voting's done): The rule of the snobs is over. It's time to give one of us a chance to lead.


Sen. John McCain's one of us, too. He raised hell at Annapolis (quadruple ugh: military!), and he'll raise the right kind of hell in Washington . McCain's so dumb he really loves his country. Sarah Palin's dumb that way, too.


How terribly unfashionable.


Photobucket

I used to be a liberal . . .

In His Own Words



The ACORN and the Senator

September 29, 2008, 2:30 p.m.


An ACORN Falls from the Tree
A congressional outrage.


By Ken Blackwell


As negotiations over Congress’s emergency rescue bill continued over the weekend, repeated rumors leaked out that the Democrats were trying to funnel money to a hyper-partisan organization involved in criminal voter fraud. I’m speaking of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now — known by its acronym, ACORN. Although ACORN was cut from the final legislation, it’s important to understand this organization and its long history with, of all people, Barack Obama. And it’s important to see how partisan this emergency legislation has become.


As the weekend progressed, reports were constantly emerging of the sticking points preventing a final agreement. One of these reputed points of contention was whether 20 percent of the profit proceedings for asset sales in the future would go to what is called the Housing Trust Fund, subsidizing certain groups for ostensibly nonpartisan activity. One of these groups that this trust supports is ACORN.


ACORN has often been in the news since 2004. Officially, they work to register voters and support housing. In reality, everyone in public life knows that they are hardcore supporters for the Democratic Party, and employ bare-knuckle tactics. Their organization is plagued by repeated investigations of voter fraud and other crimes.


In Ohio, where as secretary of state I oversaw elections for eight years, ACORN has been busy. One ACORN man in Reynoldsburg was indicted on two felony counts of voter fraud, and another was indicted in Columbus. Other such problems surfaced in Cuyahoga County, where criminal investigations are ongoing.


It’s not just Ohio. ACORN personnel are facing criminal charges in over a dozen states. In Washington State, for example, seven ACORN leaders had felony charges filed against them for voter fraud.


And there’s an unexpected twist. One of the organizations accused of pushing banks into making many of the unwise loans at the heart of the current crisis is … ACORN. Now that’s ironic. An organization that possibly contributed to our current financial profits is now being considered to make money off of it. And by “money,” I’m referring to your tax money.


Twice already this year Congress has funneled money to ACORN. Some report that February’s economic stimulus included funds for ACORN, as did the bill to help people struggling with mortgages passed this April.


What deserves closer scrutiny is Barack Obama’s history with ACORN. Obama cites Saul Alinsky, a self-acknowledged radical who advocated extreme acts to achieve social goals, as one of his inspirations. ACORN follows the Saul Alinsky model. After Obama graduated from Harvard, he went to work for ACORN in Chicago. Mr. Obama then became a trainer for ACORN, teaching others how to employ ACORN tactics in voter registration drives.


This ACORN involvement coincides with the increasing partisanship of this situation.


Congressional Democrats, and specifically Mr. Obama, are now saying that the problem underlying all this is “deregulation,” pushed by the Republicans. There are two fundamental flaws with this allegation.


First, this is not deregulation. This is not the private sector. Fannie and Freddie are government creations, that pay their executives millions of dollars but are shielded with your tax money from suffering the downside risk of the market. Engage in racetrack-style financing, they must be strictly controlled. Deregulation is about keeping government from hobbling the private sector and hamstringing its ingenuity and productivity. Deregulation does not apply.


Second, Republicans have tried to rein in Fannie and Freddie. Republican attempts to reform them in 1999 failed. In 2003, when Alan Greenspan testified about how Fannie and Freddie’s loose practices could endanger our financial system, it was Democrat Barney Frank who said these institutions were fundamentally sound, and should be more aggressive in getting loans to low-income people. In 2005, a Republican reform passed the Senate Banking Committee on a party-line vote, only to be blocked by Democrats from passing the full Senate. And in 2006 when John McCain spoke on the Senate floor of the need to reform Fannie and Freddie immediately, Democrats (including Barack Obama) would not respond.


You can also see where Fannie and Freddie look for protection by where they direct their money. Public records show that the top two recipients of Fannie/Freddie campaign contributions are Sens. Chris Dodd and Barack Obama, taking $165,000 and $126,000, respectively. Dodd, who chairs the Senate Banking Committee, and Mr. Obama, who says he’s going to remedy the whole situation.



It suddenly seems so clear why Democrats want ACORN to get some of the taxpayers’ money. I have unapologetically criticized Republicans, some by name, for out-of-control spending, lack of accountability, and other inexcusable actions that have tarnished the GOP and disserved the nation. And there are other issues that are either both parties’ fault, or no one’s fault.


But here, the Democrats are squarely to blame. They have resisted all attempts at reforming Fannie and Freddie, and pushed those organizations to become ever more reckless in their policies. This made the investments on Wall Street carrying those tainted mortgages go from bad to worse, and now we’re in a crisis and on the verge of a meltdown.


This is inexcusable. And if independent voters figure this out, their outrage over this situation will suddenly be directed against the party that pushed these disastrous policies. So Democrats want ACORN to get as much funding as possible, because they might need some new votes in their column on Election Day.


Voter fraud is in one sense the worst crime against democracy. The sole means of democratically choosing leaders is through voting. Every voter gets an equal vote. Every citizen who is a law-abiding adult has an equal voice in who will govern us. Our vote is sacred. Those engaging in voter fraud are in one sense no different than who intimidated voters at the polls in years past. Voter fraud may not be attended by the suffering that accompanied the beatings and water hoses of those days, but the assault on democracy is no less real.


ACORN is a discredited organization, and far too many of its leaders and workers have been prosecuted for felonies against democracy. The idea that a single dime of taxpayer money would ever go to such a group is an outrage.


And Mr. Obama needs to explain his involvement with them.


— Ken Blackwell, a former Ohio secretary of state, is a senior fellow at the American Civil Rights Union. He has also served as an undersecretary at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The Biggest Losers are Taxpayers

Nancy & Company just couldn't resist the urge to inject "partisan politics" into this economic crisis.
her speech on the floor, blaming the crisis on Republicans showed just how ignorant and out of touch she really is!

Nancy, we've all seen the videos of Bush Administration officials asking "democratic" leaders to implement regulation on Fannie & Freddie, you all said No. We've all seen video of Senator McCain speaking about a bill that he co-sponsored with 3 other Republican leaders in 2005 that called for oversight and regulation.....you all said no. And we've all seen the CEO of Fannie Mae come before Barack Obama and the entire Congressional Black Congress in 2005 and warn them that there were "serious problems" but you all still, did nothing. YOUR PARTY THROUGH CHRIS DODD, BARACK OBAMA AND JOHN KERRY, hold the record in the most money received from the Fannie Mae.


Obama, honestly, that guy cannot stay away from the lights, cameras and microphones. He looks so slippery -- its disgusting.


Photobucket

The Dems just never, ever learn. They should watch some of the tapes of the 2004 election ----- Kerry vs. Bush ---- they shoud have won, all indications were that they would, but they didn't. This is a repeat performance of the 2004 election - Obama & his minions think they're going to win.


As the saying goes, you can lead the Donkey to Water, but you can't make him drink! lol

BIGGET LOSER IN 2004........
Photobucket

BIGGEST LOSER IN 2008.......
Photobucket

Monday, September 29, 2008

WE TOLD CONGRESS SO but GREED by DEMOCRATS Won Over Knowledge

Dire warnings go back nine years ago saying that the Community Reinvestment Act would eventually cause a major financial and banking crisis in this country.


Wall Street Journal raised concerns about Fannie's and Freddie's capital requirements. Senator Phil Gramm (R, TX) raised issues about community pressure groups, such as Barack Obama's ACORN, extorting money from banks by holding their feet to the CRA fire, and threatening to militate against mergers and acquisitions unless the banks entered into preferential agreements with community groups.


Fannie and Freddie became big contributors to the Democratic Party.


The Bush administration in 2003 tried to change the system, to no avail. Congressman Barney Frank, (D, MA ) was in the forefront of stopping the Bush proposal to take control out of Fannie and Freddie and put it into a third overseeing organization.


Dodd, like Obama, has been a big recipient of campaign funds from Fannie and Freddie, organizations that Dodd oversees. Dodd has apparently been more consumed with campaign contributions from the mortgage giants than the responsibilities of oversight.

It's the DEMOCRATS, the greedy DEMOCRATS, especially Sen Dodd, Obama, Reid, and Cong. Rangel and Speaker Pelosi, as well as ACORN! Don't be stuck on STUPID.

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Do I laugh or do I cry?

Photobucket

I don't know whether to laugh or cry. I've written all 100 U S Senators in yesterday and today regarding the $700B Bail Out. I am emotionally spent.

Here's the letter I sent to the Republicans:
Dear Senator ____________:

As a Senator, you represent your constituents and you also represent the entire USofA. As a US Senator, you also represent me, even if I don't live in ______________.

NO, no, no, no, no. Please do not vote for the $700B Bail Out!

The people who caused this problem need to bear the expense of fixing up the problem. Let Sen. Dodd and Sen. Obama and Barney Frank and Sen. Reid and Speaker Pelosi RETURN the money that they got from the lobbyists.

AND NO PROVISION FOR ACORN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ACORN perpetuates fraudulent voter registration practices. Its nothing but a BRIBE to give them ANY of our -- I'm a taxpayer -- MY part of the $700B.

NO, vote NO, vote NO and make some noise about it.

This cannot be allowed to continue. Do NOT give away MY money to fund ACORN or to be skimmed by Paulson and Bernanke and who knows who else. You know it, you know it in your heart of hearts, you know it. And Pelosi and Reid and the Democrats will come out of this the "heroes" with their pockets lined with kickbacks. YOU KNOW IT.

VOTE NO to giving MY taxes to Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Dodd, Obama, Paulson, Bernanke et al.

Thank you for taking the time to read this.

S/S

retired and tired of being scammed by Congress.

"If we do not protect life, there is no reason to fight for any other cause."


I think that after I vote this Tuesday (early vote), I am going to take the Month of October off and get away from the computer as much as I can without going into withdrawal. I will be online for the Debates, of course. And after 4 November, I'm going to "get a life" away from politics!

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Welcome to the United Socialist States of the Republic

It has already started. Saul Alinsky, a community organizer, would be proud of his student. Call it what you will, the USofA is on its way to becoming a Socialist Country. Well on its way. Here is the plan on the Internet.

Obama's "Universal" Service Plan - Part 1

Training a Socialist Army of World Servers




Obama, the Children, a Parallel Universe and Missouri's Governor's Letter



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Contact: Jessica Robinson, 573-751-0290
Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement

JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.

“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.

“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.

“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.

“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”

Democrats Exposed In This Video



Friday, September 26, 2008

PROOF that the Democrats are to Blame for Financial Disaster

Five Hundred Forty Four with Sen. McCain as POTUS

545 PEOPLE
By Charlie Reese


Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, a nd nine Supreme Court justices
545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing.&nb sp; I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and tax es. Who is the speaker of the House? She is the leader of the majority party.
She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal gov ernment, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.

If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ.

If they do not receive
social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like 'the economy,' 'inflation,' or 'politics' that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.


They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!


Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.


What you do with this article now that you have read it is up to you, though you appear to have several choices.


1. You can send this to everyone in your address book, and hope' they' do something about it.


2. You can agree to 'vote against everyone that is currently in office, knowing that the process will take several years.


3. You can decide to 'run for office' yourself and agree to do the job properly.


4. Lastly, you can sit back and do nothing, or re-elect the current bunch.


How does one say "oops" in Arabic?

Go here to see the video.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Bring the Revolution home; kill your parents

The key to Saul Alinsky's success: To persuade hundreds of thousands of ignorant young people that it is much more moral to be immoral. Or, as Bill Ayers famously said, "Bring the Revolution home; kill your parents."

A lot of the Boomer Left is marked by psychopathic behavior, in politics and in the rest of life.

Alinsky's disciples -- including Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama -- have a warlike political style. They learned politics as war from the Master. Obama is so well-trained in Alinsky tactics that he used to teach workshops on it. That is why Obama can knowingly violate Federal law against usurping the presidential power to negotiate with Iraq before ever getting elected. Actual election to head of state by the voters means nothing, just as it means nothing to Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer, who have negotiated with Syria and the Muslim Brotherhood in clear violation of law while serving in Congress.

Teaching hatred for the normal majority is the key to power for radicals. But Alinsky taught that you can't easily hate millions of people. To do that effectively you need a one-person scapegoat to focus all your hatred on. "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." That is the politics of personal destruction, and it doesn't matter if the target is black like Clarence Thomas, or a woman like Sarah Palin, or a severely wounded war veteran like John McCain.

Normal, decent America is the enemy for these people.


Obama and Hillary are lifelong followers of Alinsky. They use his tactics and ideology. That is why American politics became the politics of personal destruction when the Boomer Left came to power.

Alinsky dedicated Rules for Radicals:

"... to the very first radical . . . who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom - Lucifer."

Obama . . . Yes We Can . . . Ask Questions





The Party Matters . . . Par-Tee, Par-Tee, Par-Tee.

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Democrats



The Democrats were warned in 2005 about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but they refused to cooperate in a Bi-Partisan effort. Watch the video.

Sen Obama's Missing Parts

Missing Parts of the Resume of: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

1.) Certificate Of Live Birth
Proven fake by more than one source
2.) Sketchy childhood
We know some details - Lots of gaps - Muslim?
3.) College thesis has vanished
Was it anything like Michelle’s?
4.) Overseas travel
Pakistan? Why? On what passport?
5.) Law records
What cases did he represent?
6.) Senate records disappeared
What was he trying to hide?
7.) Associations
Rev Wright, Fr Pfleger, Ayers, Dohrn, Rezko, Davis, ACORN, etc.
8.) Senate voting record
That speaks for itself
9.) SCOTUS
Who would his choices be?
10.) Proven Liar
11.) Inexperienced
12.) Racist, Sexist, Radical, Marxist views

Thank you Mouse1

Economic Fix by Changing One Little Accounting Law

Please read Dave Ramsey's Suggestion.

Remember Enron, WorldCom, Adelphia, and other companies had artificially put assets on the books? They'd say something was worth $10M when they bought it, but eventually it decreased in value, and they never updated the value in the books. That was part of the fraud. Under current laws at that time, they were all convicted and put in jail for fraud.

Then we got all mad and made all these new laws that are coming out the wazoo called sarbanes oxley. It's a huge, massive law but the idea is that we were going to mandate ethics to corporate America because apparently they didn't have any, according to the Enron failure. It's now a total pain in the butt to execute it in a publicly traded company.

It didn't work because you can't cause ethics to happen. However, it does make each company each day restate what their assets are worth if sold on the market. This accounting procedure is mark to market accounting--you need to remember that. It's a good concept and keeps companies from having loaded balance sheets.

How This Affects Us Today

However, it's part of what's caused this in the news now. Merrill Lynch was sitting with $30 billion are tied up in sub-prime loans with houses. Stupid! They get what they deserve for doing that, and I'm with you on that. Those houses didn't become worthless all of a sudden because those people couldn't sell their bonds. Since they couldn't sell them, they basically gave them away for 22 cents on the dollar. Now do you think all those houses lost 80% of their value underneath that deal? No, they didn't, so they gave them away for 22 cents on the dollar (about $6 billion total) because there was no market for them. Nobody wants to buy sub-prime bonds because they suck. They're junk bonds. But at 22 cents on the dollar, it's a bargain because even if you foreclosed on every one of the houses in there, you'd probably get $20 billion back out of $30 billion, and so the company that bought those for $6 billion got a deal! But there's no market for them. That's where these companies are stuck. They can't sell this stuff, but accounting-wise, they've had to mark it down to market and it's frozen the marketplace.

Economist Wesberry is saying that if we change that one rule and don't force them to market down to market and just let them hold on to all the stuff, and say just on sub-primes for this period of time you can change that rule -- a temporary change -- that'll free the market up. It's seized right now; it's frozen. This will thaw it out and get it going again. He says that'll solve 60% of the problem ... and I think he's right.

That one accounting rule is what made Merrill Lynch sell out. That one accounting rule is what's driving other ones into the dirt. Would you rather let them change their accounting rule or loan them $700 billion for us to buyout their bad paper?

I'd rather them work their own crap out than change the accounting rule.

I don't like giving them any money or any help with my tax dollars. But I'd rather see that than see the whole thing turn completely upside down in a fruit basket turnover rather than have a whole meltdown or something and freak out here in the middle of the election season. Why don't we just take the FHA insurance program and extend it across these sub-primes? What that means is that you and I are guaranteeing the lender that they're not going to lose as much or any money on those mortgages. Now I don't like guaranteeing them, but I like it better than buying them. In other words, instead of $700 billion in tax-payer debt going out there to bail out these companies, just extend the insurance out. You could probably do that for less than $40 billion. It's like a 95% savings!

If the government insured those mortgages, they would then be marketable. And could sell them. And the companies would stay afloat. And we, the people, don't have to get into the mortgage business. Now we're going to get in there a little bit because of the insurance on those getting foreclosed on. But foreclosures aren't causing this. This is being caused because these companies are frozen and seized up. We've got to let some of the steam come off and put some oil in there to get this thing moving again. We can do that without going into debt $700 billion.


Read HOW to go about this at Dave Ramsey's website.

Contact your Congresspeoples at http://www.senate.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Sen Obama and Partial Birth Abortion



Partial Birth Abortion is the worst form of Child Abuse and an act of Violence Against Women. And Sen. Obama approves it.

Sunday, September 21, 2008

What the godless Left really thinks

Two paragraphs from the Canada Free Press, you can read the rest online.

The godless Left, rampant in the democracies outside America, adores a candidate who shares their perception of America as the home of bigots clinging to their religion. He says privately what they yell publicly. People in these post-moral lands, who lack the gumption to even defend themselves, see a man like Obama and a party like the Democrats, which also reject the notion of self-defense in the face of evil, as the great hope of sophisticated cowards living a few more years in peace (leaving their grandchildren to live in chains and in terror) and as a kindred craven spirit.


“Like his wife and like his preacher, Obama views America as the “main enemy” in the world. So did the Soviets. So do Leftists like Veltroni, Royal, Brown, and Dion. Unlike any other major party nominee in the history of our nation, Barack Obama is campaigning against his own country and the rest of the world listens to him as the great prophet, the deliverer of the world from the problem of America. “


The Question of the Day

The question is not how much I'm in alignment with Barrack's platform.

It's how misaligned I am with John McCain's.

What about this, then?

Economy: A pro-growth, pro-jobs strategy to get our economy back on track.

Energy: Break our nation's strategic dependence on foreign sources of energy.

National Security: adapt our nation's defenses to the demands of a changing and dangerous world.

Health Care: Stop the erosion of affordable health insurance, save Medicare and Medicaid, protect private health benefits for retirees, and allow our companies to effectively compete around the world.

Iraq: Secure long-term peace and security is to establish a stable, prosperous, and democratic state in Iraq.

Homeland Security: Protecting the lives of American citizens, defending their personal freedom, and securing our land and resources.

Veterans: Provide for service members and their families while they serve, we must help those who return from combat to adjust to civilian life, and we must honor and never forget the service of those who do not return.

Immigration: Honor a pledge to do the things necessary to make the border secure.

Education: Excellence, choice, and competition in American education.

2nd Amendment: The right of law abiding citizens to keep and bear arms is a fundamental, individual Constitutional right.

Judicial Philosophy: Nominate judges who understand that their role is to faithfully apply the law as written, not impose their opinions through judicial fiat.

Technology: Provide broad pools of capital, low taxes and incentives for research in America, a commitment to a skilled and educated workforce, and a dedication to opening markets around the globe.

Fighting Crime: Supporting state and local law enforcement.

National Heritage: Commitment to clean air and water, and to conserving open space, be a leader on the issue of global warming with the courage to call the nation to action on an issue we can no longer afford to ignore.

Agricultural Policy: Expand access for U.S. agricultural producers to foreign markets.

Sanctity of Life: Commitment to the protection of human dignity.

Climate Change: Establish a market-based system to curb greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, mobilize innovative technologies.

Ethics Reform: Leadership devoted to the public interest, not the special interest, and a government that fulfills its duties with unfailing integrity, accountability.

Space Program: Ensure that space exploration is top priority and that the U.S. remains a leader.

National Service: Create a Service to America initiative to strengthen the teaching and understanding of American history, culture and core ideas, and to inspire Americans to serve causes greater than their own self interest.

Do you agree or disagree with any or all of them?

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Tina Fey spoofing Sarah Palin . . . They DO look alike

This is HUMOR, proving that Conservatives enjoy a good laugh.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

If the Virgin Mary had been a Democrat like Obama . . .

The angel Gabriel was sent from God to a town called Nazareth,to a virgin betrothed to a man named Joseph and the virgin's name was Mary. And coming to her, he said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. Behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name him Jesus. He will be great and will be called Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give him the throne of David his father, and he will rule over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end."

But Mary said to the angel, "Uh...that's a little above my pay grade. And anyway, I don't want to be punished with a baby."

What the 2nd Amendment is really for

Use Sparingly Pictures, Images and Photos

Saturday, September 06, 2008

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

The Most Anti-Catholic Presidential Candidate

Barack Obama: The Most Anti-Catholic Presidential Candidate


If you are Catholic and still don't understand why it is against your faith to vote for someone like Obama here are the basics (I ~~http://catholicfire.blogspot.com ~~ have been blogging about Obama since 2004, when I first became acquainted with him and his anti-Catholic stance on the issue of human life. As a prayer intercessor for nurse Jill Stanek at that time, I became acutely aware of the evil actions of Barack Obama, a puppet of the democratic party and the culture of death.)

Where Barack Obama stands on the issues:

* He believes in sex education provided by Planned parenthood to children at the kindergarten level (5 - year - olds!).

*He also has a voting record that consistently supports abortion - even the horrific partial - birth abortion.

*Twice, Obama voted NO to bills prohibiting tax funding of abortions. Yes, he thinks that we should pay for people to murder their children!

*In April 2007, he voted YES on expanding research to more on embryonic stem cell lines, which involves the destruction of human life.

*In July of 2006, he voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.

*In March 2005, he voted YES on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives. (Sex education starting at age 5 and contraceptives, which act as abortifacients.)

*In February 2004, his wife, Michelle, sent out a fundraising letter, which actually stated her concern over the rise of conservatism in the Country, and that the ‘so-called’ partial-birth abortion was a legitimate medical procedure that should be protected.

*In 2003, as chairman of the next Senate committee to which BAIPA (Born Alive Infants Protection Act) was sent, Obama prevented it from even getting a hearing. BAIPA stated that all live-born babies were guaranteed the same constitutional right to equal protection, whether or not they were wanted.

*In 2001 and 2002, Obama was the only Illinois senator to speak out against the "Born Alive Infants Protection Act" on the Senate floor and in 2003 killed the bill in committee. This would have outlawed "live birth abortion," where labor is induced and an infant is delivered prematurely only to be put in some dark corner of a hospital until he/she expires on his/her own.

*He voted against a cloning ban in 2000, but then turned around and voted for it in 2001.

*In 1997, Obama twice voted “present” on an Illinois partial-birth abortion ban.

In addition, he is also a strong supporter of homosexual marriages.

As you can see, his views are extreme and his record is that of a hard - core radical liberal, anti-Catholic, anti-Christian in every aspect on human life and family issues.

Islam Coexist? Muhammed said "Never!"

Islam Coexist?  Muhammed said "Never!"
Thanks al_c
"We love death. The United States loves life. That is the big difference between us." – Osama bin Laden
"I have been made victorious through terror." Muhammad, founder of Muhammadism now called Islam (Submit or Die)

Barack Obama Says He Lacks Experience To Be U.S. President

And HERE he proves it.

Obama calls it "My Muslim Faith" and This Raises More Questions

George Stephanopoulos tries to correct Obama when he says "my Muslim faith" but it wasn't a gaffe and Obama corrects Stephanopoulos. The Question is: Why say "MY Muslim faith" first? He went back to correct Stephanopoulos, but again "MY Muslim faith" was used. WHY?

Obama is to the USofA as Castro was to Cuba!

Patriots For Action dot org