Reminder to 0bama and Holder Employees

COMPUTER TRESPASS---RCW 9A.52.110---Computer trespass in the first degree.

(1) A person is guilty of computer trespass in the first degree if the person, without authorization, intentionally gains access to a computer system or electronic database of another; and (a) The access is made with the intent to commit another crime; or (b) The violation involves a computer or database maintained by a government agency.

(2) Computer trespass in the first degree is a class C felony.

National Debt Counter -- Thank the Stimulus Bill

You Are Never As Anonymous As You Think!

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts

Please Be Sure to Scroll Down to See Political Videos and Permanent Comments Located At Bottom Of This Page. Thank you.

Thursday, July 30, 2009


Czarist Amerika

Letter to my Congressman

30 July 2009

Dear Congressman Nathan Deal:

Hey, got to hear the discussion about Health Care on CSpan3. Very well put. 

I have a comment.  

WHY do the Democrats keep making the Drug Companies, Insurance Companies, and Doctors the "enemy" and attacking them? Don't they understand the economics of Medicine?  

Drug Companies are money making businesses, they spend a lot of years and their profits (and money from stocks) on discovering chemical formulas that result in helpful and healing drugs. There are major expenses for equipment, scientists, the every day costs of running a corporation (utilities, salaries, etc). Drugs don't just fall out of the air. Many take years and years to discover their efficacy. And each year has growing expenses for the Drug Companies. Add to that that many of the larger drug companies now have programs for people who cannot pay for their medicines. Their doctor can complete some forms for them and they get free or lower cost drugs from that company. Drug companies are not the enemy.  

Insurance companies are money making businesses too. They have just as much right as any other business to earn a living and to pay their employees a living wage. They don't sit in their offices and scheme how to dupe people out of their hard earned income. They use mathematics to figure out how much to charge for each insurance policy. Insurance companies don't care if States group together and lower their premium costs by providing a larger pool of people to purchase their insurance. It's NOT the Insurance Companies who are keeping people from forming large groups and purchasing Health Insurance. It's the States and probably (I didn't check) the Federal Government. Insurance Companies are not the enemy.  

Doctors are in business to earn a living for themselves and their staff, too. I've yet to meet a doctor who, if he/she couldn't reduce prices for a low income patient, would not refer that patient to a doctor who charged less. I've met doctors who will provide health care for a chicken. Yes, here in the States, in Suches, Georgia, Dr. Pruitt has been known to accept produce or farm animals in exchange for health care. He also secretly pays some of the costs of medication for his poorer patients whose pride would not allow them to accept "charity." There are some doctors who will forego their payment so that a patient can afford the hospital bill when the patient needs surgery. WHY do Democrats and the President saying that Doctors are in business to get rich? They ARE in business to pay their bills and earn a living, but they have hearts of gold . . . some maybe silver . . . but the vast majority care more about their patients than the President gives them credit for. Doctors are NOT the enemy.  

So who IS the enemy?  

I submit that WE are our own enemy. We meaning the Federal and State and Local Government and Lawyers and Laws. In many schools, children no longer have physical education because "they might get hurt" and their parents might sue. So the children sit all day and get fat. For every "excuse" imaginable, schools no longer teach Home Economics; schools no longer teach good etiquette and good eating habits. I haven't met a teacher since I was in school (about 45 years ago) who does "in room exercises" between classes to help burn energy and calories. School Administrations spend too much money on the salaries of the Administrators and little or none for programs which would educate students in good and healthful living habits. They want to teach small children about "Sam having two daddies" but they don't teach good eating habits. Nor do they have the parents come in for classes in how to prepare nutritious after school snacks. (The Extension Service used to do that when I was a little child 60 years ago.)  

As Adults, we sit and watch TV or sit in front of our Computers instead of getting actively involved in a hobby which would get our bodies moving. WE are responsible for much of our own Medical Problems and Costs. Not all of them, because we don't choose to catch pneumonia or to fall off a horse and break a leg. But we do choose to eat fattening foods and sit all day.  

How can Congress legislate that people quit watching reality television and get involved in some activity? They can't. Neither should Congress be involved in trying to provide Medical Health Coverage for everyone in the USofA.  

The Next thing, Congress will say we have a "right" to a life insurance policy. Where did I put my copy of the Constitution of the United States of America?  

Please bring up my concerns, if you can, and encourage Congress to vote NO on ANY Government Health Care.  

Government Health Care 
Efficiency of FEMA 
Compassion of IRS  

Thank you,  
Retired and with too much time on my hands (lol) 
******PS****** I am not related to any of the businesses listed above and have no Doctors in my close family. A cousin is a Veterinarian and a Cousin-in-law is an RN.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Stop Socialism Now . . . Gun Control via Treaty?


Canada Free Press Reports what US Media Hides

Obama Media Machine Rushing to Derail Treason Charges

The truth is inescapable… Nobody works this hard to hide the simple truth kept in his personal records, unless that truth in some way threatens his current standing.

The 25-28% of American voters, including most members of the US press who desire a “New Amerika” run on the principles of Karl Marx instead of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, couldn’t care less whether or not Obama meets Constitutional standards because they couldn’t care less what the Constitution says about anything.

But the people who took an oath to protect and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, have a very different view of the subject.  Sooner or later, one way or another, the nation and the world is going to know the truth about the mystery messiah.

You see, people don’t hide or run from the truth unless the truth presents a threat of some sort. Whatever it is in Obama’s files, it’s clear that it presents a threat greater than all of the damage being done by the secret.

For trust to exist in any relationship, secrets cannot exist. And in this case, secrets of this magnitude with implications so far reaching, the secret itself threatens the stability of the entire federal government and its command of men and women who have taken an oath to protect and preserve the US Constitution and the free republic.

"Birther" Issue Explodes

Instead of simply opening those records and ending the debate, Obama has chosen to spend a million bucks keeping those records locked up and now, House members have decided to pass a non-binding resolution declaring Obama a “citizen” without first demanding to see the evidence necessary to prove their claim.

This is the stuff that real conspiracies are made of.... It’s not a “theory” that the Natural Born Citizen clause is a Constitutional requirement for the presidency, it’s a reality.

It’s not a theory that Obama’s records will either prove or disprove his eligibility for office, it’s a fact.

And it’s not a theory that when someone works this hard to hide something, there must be something worth hiding....

To know with certainty what the Founders meant by “natural born citizen,” one need look no further than the “natural law” at the foundation of everything they did.

Natural law says, when a father has a son, the son is the “natural born” descendent of the father, assuming his sir name and his citizenship by “birth right.” No man-made law is needed to establish the “birth rights” of the son.

The Founder’s used the “natural born citizen” clause to avoid any obvious conflicts in the Oval Office resulting from dual, divided or questionable loyalties to any foreign government or nation.

In Obama’s case, no matter whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya, he cannot meet the Founder’s constitutional standard because he was born the son of an Arab-Muslim British subject from Africa, and therefore, has obvious dual or divided loyalties, which are now easily demonstrated by his “global agenda” at odds with American interests.

Clearly, the “birther” movement has hit full stride and investigators are getting too close for comfort. Hence the all-out media blitz of vicious attacks on “birthers” – baseless accusations of “racism” and non-binding congressional measures, all aimed at derailing the citizen effort to unmask the mystery messiah.

Just open the man’s files. If he has nothing to hide, why are you all working to hard to hide it?

Friday, July 17, 2009

Rev. James David Manning ~~~ BOOM SHAKALAKA!!!

More On Health Care and Obama

It's Not An Option by Investor's Business Daily

H.R. 3200 America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 (Introduced in the House)

Obama Information

Obama's Health Care Reform = Euthanasia for Elderly

I sent this letter to a number of Senators.

Please read my letter to my family and friends:

Dear One and All:

This is a mass mailing and if you NEVER want to hear from me again, then email me back and tell me so because I am emailing to nearly everyone in my Address Book, because I think this topic is of utmost importance to us all.

I've listened to this interview and made a few notes below. IF you agree, then let your Congress people know that you agree. But if you don't agree, call, snail mail, email your Congress members and tell them so. And you just might want to pass this around to any of your "elderly" friends to read so that they can listen to the interview and do their own research.

This is the reason Obama wants to get this Health Care bill passed before anyone has the opportunity to read it.

Betsy McCaughey Interview Patient Advocate and Founder of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths and a former lieutenant governor of New York State.

Health Care Bill Page 16, 17 states you CANNOT keep your current health care, you will be forced to buy into a low grade HMO that limits specialists and tests. And the cost will be more for less medical coverage. (This is explained right at the end of the interview.)

The Health Care Bill is half paid for with a 5 Hundred Billion Dollar CUT in health care benefits and services for seniors. They are cutting patient care. How? Keep listening . . . by denying care to the elderly based on "comparative effectiveness treatment" or by taking the cost of treatment and dividing it by number of years patient is likely to benefit. (You might want to meditate on that a while if you're over age fifty.)

On Page 425 of Obama's health care bill, the Congress will make it MANDATORY require EVERYONE who is on Social Security to undergo a counseling session every 5 years with the objective being that they will explain to them just how to end their own life earlier. How to to decline nutrition, to decline hydration, or go into hospice care for medicare recipients.

If an elderly person gets sick between these five year counseling periods, such as cancer, you must have these counseling sessions again, in order to do what is in your family's or society's best interest and cut your life short.

In Feb, slipped in to The Stimulus Bill was something called "comparative effectiveness research" which is a code for denying care based on a patient's birth date. Cost of treatment divided by number of years patient is likely to benefit. Age related treatment is usually denied because they have too few years left. (Such as Macular Degeneration, Alzheimers, Osteoporosis.)

THE DIRTY LITTLE SECRET: The Elderly are going to be especially hit by a Democratic Party that is always trying to scare people about their Social Security benefits. When George Bush was accused of cutting Medicare, they went nuts. This is the biggest crime on the backs of doctors, hospitals and the elderly people in the history of this Country.

An Example of How This Works: in 2006, the British National Health Service issued an edict using "comparative effectiveness research" stating "elderly people with macular degeneration could not get a new drug to save the vision in one eye until the vision in the other eye has been lost because that was the "cost effective way of doing it."

This is where the money is. When Barack Obama talks about saving money "in the long run" where do you think he's going to get those savings? By shortening your father's or mother's life. You can't pay for the treatment for your parents yourself.

In the bill: No one can get more health care by paying for it themselves than anyone else because it would be 'unequal treatment.'

The president's Health Advisor Dr Ezekiel Emanuel (Rahm's brother) says People who have incurable/irreversable illnesses should not be given direct health services. Such as denying basic health care services to a person with dementia. (or a child with cerebral palsy, etc) This will hit the elderly the most.

Betsy's website:
(why that didn't highlight I don't know)

Listen again:

This is making me physically sick. I have 86 and 87 year old parents and I myself and turning 65 in a few months. I have NO intention of allowing MR Obama to kill my parents with his Euthanasia-Based Health Care.


I have asked Senator McConnell to call a news conference with ALL those in Congress who are against this Health Care Bill. READ just those pages in the News Conference. DEMAND that Congress be given time to read all the bills proposed by the President.

This Train Wreck is OUR Country. What are YOU going to do about stopping this insanity? We are headed down a path similar to Hitler's Germany, if you remember your History.

Carol , Retired and NOT planning to allow anyone to tell me when I must die "for the good of society."

Obama vs Obama on the Stimulus

Monday, July 13, 2009

Letter To Senators . . . Feel Free To Plagiarize, I did.

If my son were to claim he was better to serve in Congress because he grew up as a poor white dude raised by a single mother and can relate better to the masses, would you be insulted?

If I were to claim that I was better to serve on the Supreme Court because I grew up as a middle class white girl and can better relate to the majority of people living in the USofA, would you be insulted?

Sonia Sotomayor, if just a private citizen, would NOT be able to serve as a Juror if she revealed during 'voir dire' that her determination of the "facts" of the case would be influenced by the litigants' race, gender and national origin! It's ironic that she can serve as a judge after publicly expressing these biases.

What are you guys thinking?

Sonia Sotomayor has already verbally stated her philosophy in public over the past years, over and over again, and you guys are standing there with your palms over your ears. Remember the way the Democrats treated Robert Bork? Well, Republicans need to use the same hard hitting questions for Sonia Sotomayor. I refer you to:

Once on the Supreme Court, there will be no recourse for the litigants of her 80% incorrect/questionable decisions! Sonia Sotomayor says "fidelity to the law" but she has had 80% of her decisions over-ridden by the Supreme Court! There's usually a divorce if there's been 80% infidelity!

How can you approve Sonia Sotomayor, knowing that she is not impartial . . . just listen to her talk . . . listen to how she rolls out her words and changes her pitch. She is being deceitful by her affectation of words and the manner in which she inflects her words.

Not only should she NOT serve on the Supreme Court, she shouldn't serve on the Court of Appeals!

Supreme Court Justices are not elected officials, but Senators who drink the kool-aid and vote for someone so obviously ineligible as Sonia Sotomayor, are. You wouldn't need to consider being reelected if you'd just repeal the 17th Amendment and return to the US Constitution Article 1, Section 3 as the Founding Fathers chose for Senators to be elected.

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Why do we have a Dept of Energy?

Does anybody out there have any memory of the reason given for the establishment of the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ..... during the Carter Administration?




Didn't think so !

Bottom line .. we've spent several hundred billion dollars in support of an agency ...
the reason for which not one person who reads this can remember.


It was very simple.... and at the time everybody thought it very appropriate...

The 'Department of Energy' was instituted on 8- 04-1977

Hey, pretty efficient, huh?

AND NOW IT'S 2009,









ah, yes, good ole bureaucracy.

God Help Us!

Email Your Senators!!!

Islam Coexist? Muhammed said "Never!"

Islam Coexist?  Muhammed said "Never!"
Thanks al_c
"We love death. The United States loves life. That is the big difference between us." – Osama bin Laden
"I have been made victorious through terror." Muhammad, founder of Muhammadism now called Islam (Submit or Die)

Barack Obama Says He Lacks Experience To Be U.S. President

And HERE he proves it.

Obama calls it "My Muslim Faith" and This Raises More Questions

George Stephanopoulos tries to correct Obama when he says "my Muslim faith" but it wasn't a gaffe and Obama corrects Stephanopoulos. The Question is: Why say "MY Muslim faith" first? He went back to correct Stephanopoulos, but again "MY Muslim faith" was used. WHY?

Obama is to the USofA as Castro was to Cuba!

Patriots For Action dot org