Today's List of Articles for the Politically Conscious

Below are a list of websites with articles I would like to draw your attention to, today.  RATHER than post separately, I've just posted this once. 

Navy Fires Two Commanders ~~ WHY?  And I mean the REAL reason, not the Administration's excuse:  http://www.military.com/daily-news/2012/11/21/navy-fires-two-more-commanders.html

WH: We're Not Concerned About Possibly Misleading American People About Benghazi ~~ Are You Going To Just Sit Back and Accept This?  I certainly expect you to start asking questions PUBLICLY ... this is exceptionally serious! 
http://youtu.be/fORePNOHqQo

Obama Adm. Hit With $43 Trillion Lawsuit 
Bad news for Obama -  MarketWatch has reported that the Spire Law Group’s homeowners’ lawsuit, pending in the federal court in Brooklyn, New York,  known as the largest money laundering and rackateering lawsuit in U.S. history,  have identified the $43 trillion of laundered money by the “Banksters” and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint ventures. ~~ Are You Going To Bring This Up So That It Is IN The Congressional Record?  http://www.franklincountyvapatriots.com/2012/11/08/obama-adm-hit-with-43-trillion-lawsuit/

Watchdogs Question Obama Donor Influence in ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Meetings
Supporters of President Obama who maxed out personal contributions to his campaign or the Democratic National Committee, or helped bundle hundreds of thousands of dollars more, have been seated at the table in every publicly-announced post-election White House meeting with “business leaders,” according to lists released by the administration. ~~~ Sounds like collusion to me and I am fairly sure that it's unlawful.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/11/watchdogs-question-donor-influence-in-obama-fiscal-cliff-meetings/

The Fiscal Cliff: Another Crisis the Dems Won’t Let Go to Waste 
...despite the fact that our problems arise from too much spending, and despite the graphic warnings daily issuing from Europe where the wages of unrestrained spending and extravagant entitlements are obvious, Obama and the Democrats have nothing to offer but class warfare magical thinking about making the rich “pay their fair share,” and vague promises of future spending cuts that history shows us never materialize. The “fair share” meme, of course, is a dodge. By any objective standards, the “rich” already pay more than their fair share.
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-thornton/the-fiscal-cliff-another-crisis-the-dems-wont-let-go-to-waste/

UNION LEADERS, OCCUPIERS WANT MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE IN FISCAL CLIFF DEAL
According to NYU Local, "labor advocates and some economists insist that a permanent fix must include higher wages," and because labor unions were instrumental in helping Obama win reelection, they may pressure the president to increase the minimum wage. 
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/28/Union-Leaders-And-Occupy-Movement-Want-Minimum-Wage-Increase-In-Fiscal-Cliff-Deal

TAKE NOTE OF THIS 
FISCAL CLIFF IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR GOP TO UNDO TARP MISTAKE 
TARP, or the Troubled Asset Relief Program, was more a symbolic gesture to calm the markets rather than a real and immediate solution. Half of the money was not even spent until President Barack Obama took office nearly three months after the bill’s passage in October 2008. Much of it was mis-spent to reward Wall Street cronies; the head of the FDIC, Sheila Bair, now says that TARP was not necessary in the first place.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/29/Fiscal-Cliff-Will-Republicans-Repeat-TARP-Mistake 

The solution to Fiscal Problems:  Reduce the size and scope of Government and you could easily cut spending and reduce waste and duplication.  It will be 'painful' but all surgery is.

Thank you for reading

Making Like a Tree

Oh, dear, some of you are thinking. "Making Like a Tree" was a saying quite a number of years ago. It meant "leaving."

Alarmists will be thinking in absolute terms. Pragmatics will be wondering exactly what I mean by "leaving" and who or what I'm "leaving."

I came to another of many "eureka" [not the tent . . . joke] moments in my long life yesterday. I probably knew this from some class I took "in the dark ages" but it just registered and I'll explain why.

I started taking Protandim over three months ago and I stopped taking my amitriptyline. The first few days, I felt SO great and for six weeks I was on top of the world. I didn't have 'Fibro-fog' and I could think clearly . . . well, crazy-quilt clearly for those who don't know me . . . and I had energy like I hadn't had in years and years . . . and then, it all slowly slipped away. Just . . . day by day, I got so tired, so lethargic, so "depressed" . . . my energy was depressed. I supplemented the Protandim with Glutathione [the organic chemical that Protandim creates using my own DNA].

I went to a new doctor in another County. He's an Internal Medicine doctor. I had my Medicare Physical. I'm in GREAT [though overweight] shape. My blood pressure, my heart, my thyroid, my cholesterol, my blood is healthy. And the Doctor [Jabaley] looked at my Effexor XP and said "you're depressed." Well, no, I'm taking that for the FMS, but I do notice that it keeps me from wanting to shoot "certain political types." [THAT IS A JOKE although there is truth in most jokes, including that one.] He prescribed all my meds including the amitrip, which I did NOT refill.

So, I stopped the Protandim and picked up Kyolic and Kyolic-greens and Krill Oil [sorry Whales, I hope there's still enough in the ocean for your diminishing numbers] and Glutathione. I'm also taking an "Active Senior" vitamin and Magnesium. But the ENERGY doesn't show up. [No matter what people say, the caffeine in black tea is NOT the same as the caffeine in coffee.]

The only time I notice that I do have a burst of energy is when I drink a "Red Bull." But that's like three cups of coffee and 90 mg of caffeine. NOT a habit anyone should get into as it taxes the heart muscle. I usually drink one when I'm driving to visit my children/grandchildren. After four or five hours on the road, I'm ready for a nap. The Red Bull is a great pick me up and wakes me up. [Brushing my teeth with a peppermint toothpaste used to work to wake me up.] But I'm not so uneducated in the physiology of my body that I'd make a habit of drinking Red Bull. It's for what I deem "emergency" use, only.

Well, Saturday, I ate out for breakfast . . . at a favorite breakfast restaurant owned and run by some friends. I had a bacon, egg, and cheese English muffin and three cups of coffee. I was about half way through the BEC when I noticed my body responding positively to the food.

Eureka . . . [not the vacuum cleaner]. My body needs not just a "balanced diet" whatever that really means; it needs a certain percentage of the nutrients in different foods. Not just protein, but also carbohydrates, fat, calcium, sodium, potassium, sugar, and vitamins and minerals and probably a lot of 'other' nutrients in small unnoticeable quantities. Energy. E=mc2. One of Einstein's great insights was to realize that matter and energy are really different forms of the same thing. Matter can be turned into energy, and energy into matter.



What does this have to do with me? Matter, or food, enters my body, is met "with the same amount of 'anti-matter' in my digestive tract" . . . starting with my mouth . . . and produces energy . . . that body chemistry that tells my brain "I feel great! I can conquer the world . . . or at least my part of my world." The energy that rejuvenates my body has to be the correct "formula" in order for it to be equal to the formula of the "anti-matter" needs of my body so that it can produce the energy I need to function and live.

Eureka . . . and I don't mean Archimedes' exclamation upon discovering how to measure the volume of an irregular solid to be able to determine the purity of a gold object.

So, I went to the grocery store and decided on a menu that I hope will give me the quality and quantity of nutrients my body needs to continue to produce the energy I need . . . and a side effect is that I'm "leaving" some of the groups I belong to . . . they DEPRESS me! All the politics and the stupidity and uncaring attitude by the person who sits in the Oval Office in DC . . . AND the Congress AND the Republicans in the House and Senate . . . not all of them . . . MOST of them . . . and the tiresome negative comments about the few Conservative Republicans who are DOING something . . . I've had it. I am leaving!

And my brain and body tell me I am doing the best thing for my own sanity.

Thanks Archimedes and if I may use your term: ηὕρηκα

Cato Institute Scholars Analyze the 2010 State of the Union Address

Sebelius Praises Abortion Accounting Trick in Senate Bill

Health Secretary Kathleen Sebelius discusses abortion coverage in the Senate health bill with a representative from BlogHer on December 21, 2009.


In other words, Harry Reid LIED to Senator Ben Nelson to get his vote.

Canada Free Press Reports what US Media Hides

Obama Media Machine Rushing to Derail Treason Charges

The truth is inescapable… Nobody works this hard to hide the simple truth kept in his personal records, unless that truth in some way threatens his current standing.

The 25-28% of American voters, including most members of the US press who desire a “New Amerika” run on the principles of Karl Marx instead of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, couldn’t care less whether or not Obama meets Constitutional standards because they couldn’t care less what the Constitution says about anything.

But the people who took an oath to protect and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, have a very different view of the subject.  Sooner or later, one way or another, the nation and the world is going to know the truth about the mystery messiah.

You see, people don’t hide or run from the truth unless the truth presents a threat of some sort. Whatever it is in Obama’s files, it’s clear that it presents a threat greater than all of the damage being done by the secret.

For trust to exist in any relationship, secrets cannot exist. And in this case, secrets of this magnitude with implications so far reaching, the secret itself threatens the stability of the entire federal government and its command of men and women who have taken an oath to protect and preserve the US Constitution and the free republic.

"Birther" Issue Explodes

Instead of simply opening those records and ending the debate, Obama has chosen to spend a million bucks keeping those records locked up and now, House members have decided to pass a non-binding resolution declaring Obama a “citizen” without first demanding to see the evidence necessary to prove their claim.

This is the stuff that real conspiracies are made of.... It’s not a “theory” that the Natural Born Citizen clause is a Constitutional requirement for the presidency, it’s a reality.

It’s not a theory that Obama’s records will either prove or disprove his eligibility for office, it’s a fact.

And it’s not a theory that when someone works this hard to hide something, there must be something worth hiding....

To know with certainty what the Founders meant by “natural born citizen,” one need look no further than the “natural law” at the foundation of everything they did.

Natural law says, when a father has a son, the son is the “natural born” descendent of the father, assuming his sir name and his citizenship by “birth right.” No man-made law is needed to establish the “birth rights” of the son.

The Founder’s used the “natural born citizen” clause to avoid any obvious conflicts in the Oval Office resulting from dual, divided or questionable loyalties to any foreign government or nation.

In Obama’s case, no matter whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya, he cannot meet the Founder’s constitutional standard because he was born the son of an Arab-Muslim British subject from Africa, and therefore, has obvious dual or divided loyalties, which are now easily demonstrated by his “global agenda” at odds with American interests.

Clearly, the “birther” movement has hit full stride and investigators are getting too close for comfort. Hence the all-out media blitz of vicious attacks on “birthers” – baseless accusations of “racism” and non-binding congressional measures, all aimed at derailing the citizen effort to unmask the mystery messiah.

Just open the man’s files. If he has nothing to hide, why are you all working to hard to hide it?

Obama, QUIT Blaming Bush for DEMOCRAT Mistakes

Timeline shows Bush, McCain warning Democrats of financial and housing crisis; meltdown. THE BLAME FALLS AT THE FEET OF THE DEMOCRATS!!!

Conclusions

I have come to the conclusion that Republicans in general are afraid of confrontation and conflict. They're wussies. They afraid of being attacked personally for the skeletons in their closets.

Democrats on the other hand wear their indiscretions as badges, thinking that it's an honor to be a thief, a whore monger or pro-killing-unborn-babies. They bait those who do not agree with their philosophies and then try to chew them up and spit them out in degraded heaps of human-dung.

Why are Republicans like this? Simple if you spend a few days contemplating all the potential and possible reasons, actually. Republicans are awash in an agendaless sea. The Republican leadership thinks that they can gain more members by becoming all encompassing and "centrist" or luke-warm on issues. Republican leaders think that by becoming "Democrat light" they will win over some of the more conservative Blue Dog Democrats. They know they'll never win over the Yellow Dog Democrats.

The Democrats look at the Republicans and snicker. Democrats have become the party of Socialism by appropriating social activism and when comparing it to capitalism; describing it as the opposite as if there can be no capitalism in social activism and no social activism in capitalism.

And both Parties are destroying the moral fiber of the USofA. To make the Republican Party stronger, the Legislators and their staffs must immerse themselves in the writings of The Founding Fathers. To get the correct mind set, they must study what was happening in American and World History at the time the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution and The Federalist Papers were written. They must be able to argue forceably using direct quotes from The Founding Fathers. And they must be alert to the Democrats' ploy of twisting conversations around to become attacks on the person who is speaking rather than on what the person is saying. The Democrats will have no argument to counter anyone who is speaking the truth and using direct quotes from The Founding Fathers. The Republicans must reprimand any Democrat who publicly or privately attacks the personality or character of any Republican. Or of any conservative. This behavior must not be tolerated.

And Republicans MUST NOT ATTACK EACH OTHER in public. A quiet meeting behind closed doors where those who disagree discuss their disagreements and their similarities and resolve their differences is more in keeping with the Founding Fathers' example.

I recently read that there is no one in the USofA who teaches Constitutional Law and that those who teach or have taught classes in Constitutional Law always have had a personal agenda, usually a liberal agenda. Mostly they tried to make The Constitution a "living document." Well, just like the Ten Commandments, The Constitution is set in stone. It's not 'dead' by any means, but it is not something that can be bent and twisted by those with an anti-Constitution agenda. There are no "10 suggestions" and there is no pick and choose Articles and Sections.

What is WRONG in Congress right now . . . and has been for over 100 years, is that Congress has not confronted UnConstitutional legislation and branded it as such. To save our Republic, Congress MUST insist that every piece of legislation pass the "Constitution smell test." And if it doesn't walk like the Constitution, talk like the Constitution and smell like the Constitution, the bill must be scuttled before it reaches the Floor of the House or the Senate.

And I'm passing this along to Chairman Steele, Sen. McConnell and Rep. Boehner and copying it to my other "pages" online.

Georgia Rep. Tom Price . . . and the Stimulus Bill

New RNC Chair and Other Information

Letter sent to Sens McConnell and Kyle and Reps Boehner and Cantor as Republican Leadership in Senate and House.

A new day is dawning in the Republican Party. The RNC has elected its first Roman Catholic, Pro-Life, Chair. And he happens to be black. Unlike the Democrats, he was elected because of who he is and what he stands for and not because of the color of his skin. It's a proud day for Republicans.

What this means for Republicans is that we can now stand firm on a Traditionally Conservative Agenda. The new RNC leadership will lead the way. It is up to Republicans in Congress to close ranks with the RNC and stand strong, shoulder to shoulder, supporting what is good and right and just about the USofA.

Please get the Senate Republicans to stand together and vote against the current administrations attempts to 'bail out' or 'stimulate' the Economy. Please get Republicans to stand together against the current administration placing in positions of power (Cabinet, et al) Democrats who have checkered backgrounds (at best) and have broken the laws of the land with impunity and are allowed a "mea culpa" out of legal action.

Please counter the current administration with the facts about the cost of the various Bills and who eventually gets the money. Try to get this information into the Congressional Record. Please bring to the forefront all the facts about candidates the current administration brings to Congress for positions of power. Try to get this into the Congressional Record. (Cabinet now, Judicial later.)

It is a new day and a good day for Republicans. If Republicans in Congress will stand together against the current administration's Bills, any failure of those Bills will rest solely on the shoulders of the Democrats and the current administration. If a failure cannot be blamed on "bi-partisanship" and from there on the Republicans, the voters will have to face the fact that "it's Obama's fault."

It is the right time for Republicans to vote against Democrat initiated Bills. It is the right time for Republicans to say "no" to requests for adding a Republican name to a Democrat Bill to make it "bi-partisan." Please remind those Republicans who are infamous for "bi-partisanship" that NOW is not the time to play with the Democrats. There will be time later, but for right now, for at least the first 100 days of the current administration, the Republicans would do well to allow all the Bills in Congress to be passed (if they are) solely by Democrats with no Republican votes.

Thank you,

Retired

PS: http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=87622 I would ask Republicans in Congress to "recuse" themselves (if at all possible) in an effort to have any legal action taken against Congress for not vetting the Democrat President fall entirely at the feet of the Democrat Party, the DNC and Democrats in Congress. This Lawsuit should be allowed to be brought before the Court and the Democrats, DNC, and Democrats in Congress should have to answer the charges.

Clearing my head of politics

I am going to go "off line" for a while to clear my head. Politics is giving me a headache. I am not happy with the outcome of the Presidential election. I am taking time off to find my "muse" and to read The Federalist Papers. [http://www.americanphonic.com -- also on mp3 at this site] or [http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/]

Thank you for reading my blog. There are a lot of posts and many which will be interesting to the audience of readers.

I'll be back in 2009. Maybe before.

Happy Thanksgiving.

HRClinton Takes Umbrage (as well she should)

Hillary Clinton took no quarter Tuesday in responding to a reported claim by Barack Obama that he has more foreign policy experience than either Clinton or Republican nominee-in-waiting John McCain.

“I think a lot of people assume that might be some sort of military thing to make me look more commander in chief-like. Ironically, this is an area — foreign policy is the area where I am probably most confident that I know more and understand the world better than Senator Clinton or Senator McCain,” Obama reportedly said.

Senator Clinton also stated that Senator Obama

"failed to have a single policy hearing on the only responsibility he was given, chairing the European and NATO subcommittee on the Foreign Relations Committee."

She also stated that

"he himself admitted he was too busy running for president to pay attention to what we needed to do to improve our chances in Afghanistan and get NATO more involved."

What Barack H Obama meant was that as a young child he lived in Indonesia (where he was registered for school as Barry Soetoro, Indonesian, Muslim) and that he is a member of the Luo (Obama's ancestral) Tribe (all Muslims) in Kenya. That makes him an "expert?" But what he's an expert of is not what he's going to admit to.

Photo of Barack Hussein Obama and his Kenyan (Muslim) Family, whom he met as an adult. However is very proud of his Kenyan (Muslim) Family.


Here's a photo of the grandparents who paid the tuition for him to attend the prestigious Punahou School in Hawaii and of whom Barack H Obama is ashamed:

Barack Hussein Obama has the empathetic skill set of an anthropologist who lives with his subjects, learns their language, and elicits their hopes and fears while remaining at emotional distance. That is, he is the political equivalent of a sociopath. The difference is that he is practicing not on a primitive tribe but on the population of the United States.

Paul R. Hollrah . . . who is he?

Miserable Creatures February 20, 2007

In an interview with a Brussels newspaper (De Standaard, October 23, 2006) Dutch author, Oscar Van den Boogaard, described what appears to be the attitude of most post-WWII Europeans. He said, “I am not a warrior, but who is? I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it.”

As John Stuart Mill has said, “War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks nothing worth a war, is worse. A man who has nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety is a miserable creature who has no chance at being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.”

It is a sad picture, a Europe where so many of the people have never learned to fight for their freedom… where people were only good at enjoying it. But it is sadder still to realize that nearly half the American people – liberals, Democrats, the anti-war radicals with the loudest voices – agree with them… relying for their freedoms on the exertions of better men than they.

So what is it about the term “miserable creatures” that liberals, Democrats, and anti-war radicals find so appealing?

Deceipt February 12, 2008

Standing on the platform, surrounded on all sides by adoring sycophants, he rails at the lobbyists and the special interests who populate the halls of Congress and the executive branch. “When I am elected President of the United States,” he intones, “the lobbyists and the special interests will no longer run Washington, DC. Power will be returned to the people!”

And the crowds go crazy. They spring to their feet, screaming and shouting, waving their placards in the air...placards that read “Public Employees for Obama” and “Classroom Teachers for Obama.” These are the toadies of AFSCME, AFT, and the NEA, three of the ten most powerful special interest lobbies in Washington, who, along with the trial lawyers and the anti-American billionaire George Soros, own the Democratic Party.

We are forced to wonder, if Obama were to stand on the platform and shout, “When I am elected President of the United States the teachers unions, the trial lawyers, and the public employees unions will no longer run Washington, DC. Power will be returned to the people,” would he actually escape the auditorium unscathed? Probably not.

No Jack Kennedy February 20, 2008

Jack Kennedy was a true war hero. During World War II he served in the South Pacific as skipper of a PT boat, the famous PT-109. For his heroic action in saving the lives of his crew he was awarded the Navy & Marine Corps Medal. He was also awarded the Purple Heart, the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, and the World War II Victory Medal.

Barack Obama has no military record, no background or experience on which to judge his personal courage, his patriotism, or his ability to serve as Commander in Chief of our military forces. During the years that Obama would have served in the U.S. military, he worked on voter registration drives as a community organizer on Chicago’s south side.

In that capacity he relied heavily on the community organizing techniques of radical leftist Saul Alinsky who, quite coincidentally, was the subject of Hillary Rodham’s senior honors thesis at Wellesley College, titled, “There Is Only The Fight…”: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.”

Returning from military service, Kennedy ran for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, serving three terms from 1947 until 1953. He was then elected to the United States Senate where he served for seven more years, from 1953 to 1960, before being elected President of the United States.

Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate in 1996 and served two four-year terms with an unsuccessful run for Congress sandwiched in between. He ran for the United States Senate in 2004 and served just two years before launching a campaign to become the leader of the Free World. But what is most alarming about this ambition-driven upstart, what most distinguishes him from a man like Jack Kennedy, and what serves as the wellspring of his campaign theme, “Change We Can Believe In,” is his allegiance to the teachings of Saul Alinsky.

In his book, Rules for Radicals, Alinsky wrote: “There’s another reason for working inside the system… Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system, that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future…”

Even the most disinterested and uneducated observer of the Obama campaign style could not have failed to note the messianic nature of his approach or his fealty to the concept of “change for the sake of change.” But what “revolutionary” change? That is the question before us today. Clinton and Obama have been working “inside the system,” just as Alinsky prescribed. Are we willing to gamble on what change either of them would pursue if they were put in charge of our great nation?

So, yes, Obama, there are those of us old enough to remember Jack Kennedy. And while you try mightily to assume his mantle, it doesn’t quite work for you. Yes, you remind us of a Kennedy, alright… but it’s not Jack, it’s Ted.

What did you say? March 6, 2008

Obama told his audience that, because some folks had the courage to “march across a bridge” in Selma , Alabama , his mother, a white woman from Kansas , and his father, a black Muslim from Africa , took heart. It gave them the courage to get married and have a child. The problem with that characterization is that Barrack Obama, Jr., was born on August 4, 1961, while the first of three marches across that bridge in Selma didn’t occur until March 7, 1965, at least five years after Obama’s parents met.

Obama went on to tell his audience that the Kennedys, Jack and Bobby, decided to do an airlift. They would bring some young Africans over so that they could be educated and learn all about America . His grandfather heard that call and sent his son, Barrack Obama, Sr., to America .

The problem with that scenario is that, having been born in August 1961, the future senator was not conceived until sometime in November 1960. So if this African grandfather heard words that ‘’sent a shout across oceans,” inspiring him to send his goat-herder son to America , it was not a Democrat Jack Kennedy he heard, nor his brother Bobby, it was a Republican President, Dwight D. Eisenhower.

John McCain for POTUS

Six Big Lies About John McCain

LIE #1: John McCain isn’t a loyal Republican.

LIE #2: McCain represents a betrayal and rejection of the Reagan coalition.

LIE #3: John McCain organized “The Gang of Fourteen” to Block the Confirmation of Conservative Judges.

LIE #4: John McCain supports higher taxes.

LIE #5: McCain is an advocate of “amnesty” and “open borders.”

LIE #6: McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform represents a devastating assault on free speech.

McCain's concise, eloquent summary of his conservative philosophy:

“I seek the nomination of our Party,” he said, “because I am as confident today as I was when I first entered public life as a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution that the principles of the Republican Party – our confidence in the good sense and resourcefulness of free people – are always in America’s best interests. In war and peace, in good times and challenging ones, we have always known that the first responsibility of government is to keep this country safe from its enemies, and the American people free of a heavy-handed government that spends too much of their money, and tries to do for them what they are better able to do for themselves. We want government to do its job, not your job;; to do it better and to do it with less of your money; to defend our nation’s security wisely and effectively, because the cost of our defense is so dear to us; to respect our values because they are the true source of our strength; to enforce the rule of law that is the first defense of freedom; to keep the promises it makes ot us and not make promises it will not keep. We believe government should do only those things we cannot do individually, and then get out of the way so that the most industrious, ingenious, and enterprising people in the world can do what they have always done: build an even greater country than the one they inherited.”

How many times to make a lie sound like the truth?

"That's what I've done my entire life." "That's what I've worked for all my life."

If Hillary Clinton keeps repeating these lies often enough, will she convince you that they're true?

NEW DVD BANNED BY MEDIA: Hillary! Uncensored

Features Explosive Home Video Footage of Clinton Corruption

Now Available for Public Distribution -- IN LIMITED QUANTITIES!

"Exposing the illegalities that elected Hillary to the Senate and the
obstructions of justice that keep her there."

RETAIL $29.99 ONLY $24.95 • While Supplies Last.
ORDER ONLINE or CALL 1.800.678.3915

Hillary! Uncensored is the first major motion picture that:

* Exposes the evidence of numerous criminal violations committed by Hillary Clinton, with Bill Clinton's assistance as her agent, to win her 2000 Senate election, and then her 2006 re-election, and cover-up her accountability.

* Documents from the public record how Hillary Clinton used the President of the US, the Chairman of the DNC, a White House staff assistant, a former strip club owner and her national campaign finance director as her agents to illegally solicit and coordinate more than $1.2 million from her largest donor, a Hollywood businessman with three felony convictions from 1970's anti-Castro activities he captured discussing with Hillary on video tape!

* Explains how Hillary Clinton undermined the fundamental purpose of America's Election Laws by hiding from the FEC, and lying to the public through quotes in the Washington Post, the identity of her largest donor- Peter Paul- and how much he donated to her campaign.

* Presents questions about the FEC's role in enabling Hillary Clinton to avoid admitting she made false statements to the Washington Post- that she took no "money" from Peter Paul for her campaign when her own fourth FEC report admitted she took twice as much from Paul than any other reported donor in 2000. By the FEC allowing Hillary's campaign to file a fourth false FEC report on January 30, 2006, as part of a settlement and FEC fine for her Treasurer's prior three false reports which hid Paul's donations, the FEC allowed Hillary's campaign to contradict the evidence presented by the FBI and Department of Justice Office of Public Integrity in the May 2005 trial of her finance Director David Rosen- that Peter Paul personally contributed more than $1.1 million to Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign! This false report enabled Hillary Clinton's re-election to the Senate without addressing the proof of the false statements she made about Paul to assure her first election.

* Hillary!Uncensored shows that Hillary Clinton has conducted the most pervasive obstruction of justice and cover-up of her misconduct since Richard Nixon's Watergate obstruction and cover-up - involving the corruption of the Office of Public Integrity in the Justice Department, the corruption of a federal judge appointed by the Clintons who presided over a sham criminal trial of Hillary's finance director and the corruption of the FEC- who were all complicit in hiding the truth about Hillary Clinton's role in the frauds that elected and re-elected her to the US Senate.

Product Details Format: DVD/Dolby 2.0 Stereo/Color Encoding: Multi-regional Year: 2007 Time Running: 60 minutes

RETAIL $29.99 ONLY $24.95 • While Supplies Last.
ORDER ONLINE or CALL 1.800.678.3915

© 2007 DISCOUNT BOOK DISTRIBUTORS 1.800.678.3915
457 Nathan Dean BLVD • Suite #105-732 • DALLAS, GA 30132

If I knew how to set up a poll, I would for this

WHY doesn't the public, at the grassroots level, make a concerted effort to demand that anyone running for POTUS resign any Federal position he or she has as soon as he or she announces for the Presidency?

I don't understand this. There are Senators who cannot be representing their constituency because they're too busy raising money, attending debates, and working on obtaining enough support to win the nomination at their respective National Conventions. Why do people put up with this?

Look at the voting record of each candidate while they're running for POTUS. "What record?" Both Senator McCain and Senator Obama failed to vote On the Amendment (Kyl Amdt. No. 3017 as Modified) Vote Date: September 26, 2007, 12:44 PM. There was another vote about a half hour prior and neither Senator voted. Where were they and why are there constituents not in an uproar?

Look at who failed to vote on a Conference Report on September 24: Senators Biden, Kerry, Smith, Brownback, McCain, Dodd and Obama.

Any candidate worth my vote will not be in a Federal Office at the time of this State's Primary election.

After all this election fury is over, I just may toss my idea out to the public forum to see what happens. Bur for right now, I'm just going to watch and wait.