Reminder to 0bama and Holder Employees
COMPUTER TRESPASS---RCW 9A.52.110---Computer trespass in the first degree.
(1) A person is guilty of computer trespass in the first degree if the person, without authorization, intentionally gains access to a computer system or electronic database of another; and (a) The access is made with the intent to commit another crime; or (b) The violation involves a computer or database maintained by a government agency.
(2) Computer trespass in the first degree is a class C felony.
You Are Never As Anonymous As You Think!
Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts
Sunday, September 30, 2007
First, in the Metro section, there's an article about a student who was killed while driving to school on Friday. One statement by another student that struck me stated that the driver of the car (an 18 year old HS Senior) had just sent a text message to a friend stating she was running late for school. It makes me wonder if the teen had not been text messaging while driving, would the accident have occurred? Perhaps she was speeding and text messaging at the same time? The lesson for us all is: Pay attention to driving when you're driving and leave the multi-tasking for later, when you're not driving. I feel so sorry for her parents, the teen who was with her in the car (and was wearing a seat belt, thankfully) and all the students, faculty and family of her High School. What else can I say except "what a waste of talent and ability" and for what? I'd think being late for school was worth my own life, what about you?
Second, in the Living section, there's an article about the television show "Aliens in America." "CW" television station will carry this sit-com. It's supposed to be edgy and humorous. The "moral center" is the relationship between a male Muslim exchange student and the son of the host family. And the Islamic Center of Southern California liked it. What I see is that it's made to desensitize the viewers. You know the saying: If you say something over and over for a long time, even if it's a false statement, people will begin to believe it and believe that it's true. If the television show "Aliens in America" displays only the positive sides of a Muslim personality and doesn't show any of the negatives and doesn't explain what the Koran actually teaches about each situation in this "situation comedy" the viewers will have a skewed attitude about Muslims and Islam. (As in, "oh, it's not so bad.") What about the Truth about Islam? Be careful what you watch on television and what your family watches. It's too easy to become desensitized to the horrors of a theology such as Islam.
Third, if you're planning to donate some money to a political party or to someone who's running for POTUS, today is the last day of the quarter and might want to consider sending a donation online. My pick of course and the "savior of the earth" are linked. (BTW, if you'll Google these two words: draft gore, you'll find 1,950,000 English pages. There's a lot of grassroots voters who want him to run for POTUS in 2008.)
PS: I told you so!
Friday, September 28, 2007
What is wrong with people that they kidnap and molest someone and hold that person hostage for a week?
Do you have an answer? Where in the world does someone learn how to be that depraved?
We have so much violence going on today! Why?
We have so much theft of property today! Why?
We have all kinds of criminal activity, from raping a child and videotaping it to calling the law on someone and lying in order to get that person in trouble.
Which brings me to this question: How does one prove that they're not what they're being accused of? A perfectly innocent person can be accused by someone and the authorities believe the lying accuser, but ignore the pleas of the righteous person who denies the accusation.
What happened to "innocent until proven GUILTY?" It's become "guilty until you prove that you're innocent." Often times an innocent person has to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars just to prove that she is, indeed, innocent.
It's a travesty of justice to have to prove that you're innocent instead of having the sheriff's deputies actually do their jobs to prove that you're guilty. Especially when you know that they'll be busy til "kingdom come" trying to prove something that just ain't so.
Never live in a small town if you can help it. Trust me on this. If you live in a small town, you know where of I speak. If you think small towns are "quaint," let me tell you something: "Small towns can be deceiving." And they are more often than not.
Bur for right now, just comment on what is happening to people in the USofA that is causing the depraved and unconscionable behavior.
And if you haven't read the post below. Read it, 'cause "I told you so."
Can YOU locate the post which includes my statement that the Democrat Nominee would be Al Gore? It's somewhere in the older posts. Hillary Clinton over the top. Baraka Obama too inexperienced. The "savior of the earth" will be the Democrat Nominee. Did I not tell you so?
The 'Inconvenient Truth' for Hillary Clinton and Baraka Obama is named Albert Gore, Jr.
Told You So! Told You So! Told You So!
Thursday, September 27, 2007
BOULDER, Colo. — About 50 Boulder High School students walked out of class Thursday to protest the daily reading of the Pledge of Allegiance and recited their own version, omitting "one nation, under God."
The students' version of the Pledge "omits the reference to God and adds allegiance to constitutional rights, diversity and freedom, among other things."
Little by little the minority, in this case a couple dozen students, refuses to tolerate the wishes of the majority and files a lawsuit.
The School Board has stated that the students do not have to join in, so there is no reason for this small "Student Worker Club" (sound a bit Marxist-Leninist to you, too?) to complain. They've figured out (especially since the Andrew Meyer affair at UF) that the way to obtain the publicity they seek is to 1) have someone film you as you make a nuisance and complete a@@ of yourself for your personal website; 2) file a frivolous lawsuit under the guise of "separation of church and state" or if that won't work "taking time away from our education."
Come on, children, you can do better than that. Say it's a "hate crime" to force anyone to say the Pledge of Allegiance, at the very least.
Or, you could volunteer to trade yourself for one of the Illegal Aliens in this Country. The Illegal gets your Social Security card and you get to move to Mexico (or where ever).
Can you tell I'm a bit tired of this nonsense?
I know that the USofA will never revert to the way it was when I was growing up, but I surely do not want it to be sucked into some liberal vortex with situational ethics, "Big Brother Watching You," and anarchy. Children are not mature enough to make decisions relating to their Schooling. If children were in charge, then school would consist of six ours of "recess." Or, in some venues, watching movies, since I understand that the alarmists have sabotaged outdoor or physical activities by students for fear that they'll "harm" themselves or "touch inappropriately" or some absurd thing.
Do you ever just want to scream "GROW UP, NINNIES" in situations like the above?
Here's another one!
Democratic Candidates Say They're OK With Second-Grade Teacher Reading Gay Prince Fairy Tale
I'm going to ask you to click on and read the article yourself. But there was one postive statement by someone who wasn't there.
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who is vying for the Republican nomination for president, weighed in afterward with a statement accusing the Democratic candidates of being “out of touch” with America.
“Not one candidate was uncomfortable with young children learning about same-sex marriage in the second grade,” Romney said in the statement. “This is a subject that should be left to parents, not public school teachers. We need to strengthen our families by passing a federal marriage amendment and also insisting on marriage before having children. Change in Washington requires Democrats with the courage to stand up to their ultra liberal base and do what's right for our children."
I think I'll go off and scream now. This is just absurd. It's not morally correct. It goes against everything I believe in and 99% of the stuff I do not believe in! However, as they say: Have a good day!
HARTFORD, Conn. — Lawyers for 10 Latino men arrested in Danbury in the past year filed a civil rights lawsuit Wednesday, accusing city and federal officials of a plot to harass immigrants through illegal arrests and intimidation.
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in New Haven, alleges authorities violated the plaintiffs' constitutional rights to due process, equal protection, free speech, free association and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Professors and students at Yale Law School will be representing the ten men. One has already been deported to Ecuador.
What's wrong with this picture? How about the terminology that "immigration cases are pending" alludes that these men are ILLEGAL ALIENS and they Do Not Qualify for the same rights as US Citizens just because they stand on USofA soil. If they'd had Green Cards, they would not have been arrested, now, would they?
The mayor has stood up to the Yalies and told them that "local police provide support to federal operations and that they comply with the Constitution." Which infers that the Yale Professors and law students Do Not Comply With The Constitution. Right?
Right! It appears that they think that Marxism trumps Democracy and that they can use the freedoms we enjoy as US Citizens against us (you and me) to defend men who have entered the USofA illegally and do not have those same rights because they are not legally and lawfully supposed or allowed to be in the USofA.
WHEN will this stop?????
BUILD THE FENCE!!!!
I don't understand this. There are Senators who cannot be representing their constituency because they're too busy raising money, attending debates, and working on obtaining enough support to win the nomination at their respective National Conventions. Why do people put up with this?
Look at the voting record of each candidate while they're running for POTUS. "What record?" Both Senator McCain and Senator Obama failed to vote On the Amendment (Kyl Amdt. No. 3017 as Modified) Vote Date: September 26, 2007, 12:44 PM. There was another vote about a half hour prior and neither Senator voted. Where were they and why are there constituents not in an uproar?
Look at who failed to vote on a Conference Report on September 24: Senators Biden, Kerry, Smith, Brownback, McCain, Dodd and Obama.
Any candidate worth my vote will not be in a Federal Office at the time of this State's Primary election.
After all this election fury is over, I just may toss my idea out to the public forum to see what happens. Bur for right now, I'm just going to watch and wait.
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
FoxNews reported that in a recent Senate Hearing the following transpired:
"I would be very willing and able and supportive" to changes to the policy "to continue to allow the homosexual community to contribute to the nation without condoning what I believe to be activity — whether it to be heterosexual or homosexual — that in my upbringing is not right," Pace said.
Pace's lengthy answer on gays was prodded by Sen. Tom Harkin, who said he found Pace's previous remarks as "very hurtful" and "very demoralizing" to homosexuals serving in the military.
In March, the Chicago Tribune reported that Pace said in a wide-ranging interview: "I do not believe the United States is well served by a policy that says it is OK to be immoral in any way."
Harkin, D-Iowa, said he wanted to give Pace a chance to amend his remarks in light of his retirement.
"It's a matter of leadership, and we have to be careful what we say," Harkin said.
Pace noted that the U.S. Military Code of Justice prohibits homosexual activity as well as adultery. Harkin said, "Well, maybe we should change that."
Does Your Comment "Maybe We Should Change That" mean that you plan to change the U.S. Military Code of Justice to allow both homosexual activity and adultery? Because if you only allow one without allowing the other, you are discriminating. It appears from your comment that you found General Pace's previous comments against homosexuals 'as "very hurtful" and "very demoralizing" to homosexuals serving in the military' and that you plan only to allow homosexual activity in the Military.
There are many adulterers in the military (and in the Space Program) and if you allow only homosexual behavior you are opening the Military for lawsuits from people who have received Military punishment for adultery.
If you allow both homosexual behavior and adultery, doesn't that mean that (ex)Astronaut Lisa Nowak will be one of the first people you notify about the change in status of homosexual and adulterous behavior in the Military?
By allowing adulterous behavior in the Military, doesn't that mean that the former Commander in Chief who had "sex with that woman" can now be exonerated?
Shouldn't you take a poll of Military Personnel first to see how many plan to engage in homosexual activity and/or adultery if the U. S. Military Code of Conduct is changed?
Or maybe do you think you need to do some additional studying of the situation because opening one door without opening the other is "hateful" and "mean spirited" and "selfish" and may cause "great emotional harm" and just may not be best for our Military and our Nation?
Thank you for reading my email.
If you are unaware of the current U.S. Military Code of Conduct regarding homosexuality, you will find it here.
I completed a word search on Google and found out that adultery is not specifically mentioned in the U.S. Military Code of Conduct. Now, since the Military was nearly 100% men in the past, is there a "manly" reason that adultery is not mentioned? Why the oversight, GUYS??? You have your Adultery and now you want your Homosexual Activities, too?
Kind of eye opening, isn't it? It is obvious to me that Men Make Up The Rules!! Why is Adultery not mentioned in the U.S. Military Code of Conduct??
I'm going to contact my Senators tomorrow and ask this question. If you get an answer before I do, please let me know in the comments section.
The DREAM Act is wishful thinking for Illegal Aliens. Just because a person is living on United States soil does not give that person entitlement to any benefits of United States Citizen. The decision not to give Habeas Corpus to Detainees in Guantanamo Bay documents this truth. It is not as if we have no Legal Recourse to enter the United States. We do. Illegal Aliens should return to their Home Country and follow the rules to emigrate to the United States. The American Dream starts with Legal Immigration. To surreptitiously give Illegal Aliens the illusion of legality with the DREAM Act is tantamount to slapping the faces of every Legal Alien who has taken the time to apply for a Green Card and enter the United States legally.
Monday, September 24, 2007
Scottsdale Officer Nick Erfle, a 33-year-old married father of two and an eight-year veteran of the force, was pronounced dead at the hospital. Erik Jovani Martinez gave a false name which reported back an outstanding shoplifting charge. When officer Nick Erfle attempted to arrest Martinez he pushed Erfle to the ground, pulled out a gun and fired several shots into the officer hitting him in the face. Erfle was killed. Martinez then took a woman hostage when he carjacked her car and held a gun to her head when finally cornered. But despite a lengthy criminal history and a deportation, Martinez remained free, even after he was arrested again in the Valley just two months after he had been forced to leave the country in 2006.
Our government failed to secure the border and now wants to give illegal aliens amnesty through the Dream Act, H-1B, H-2B, . 237, the AgJOBS after having public knowledge of the many criminal acts of Illegal Aliens besides breaking into the USofA (which should have already earned the majority of Illegal Aliens deportation)????? Why?
How can you do this to us? We believed in you. We trusted you.
Unless you stop this DREAM Act and any additional talk about allowing Illegal (what part of illegal do you not comprehend?) Aliens (what part of alien do you not understand?) to come to or stay in the USofA or be given ANY amnesty, then the death of every US Citizen killed by an Illegal Alien is your responsibility.
If you really expect the Republicans to win the Presidency in 2008, you will use all your influence to stop any kind of amnesty bill attached to any unrelated bill and you will use your influence to remove the DREAM Act from the Defense Appropriations Act.
Thank you for reading my email.
sent 24 September 2007 at 4:27 PM
“The mania for giving the Government power to meddle with the private affairs of cities or citizens is likely to cause endless trouble, through the rivalry of schools and creeds that are anxious to obtain official recognition, and there is great danger that our people will lose our independence of thought and action which is the cause of much of our greatness, and sink into the helplessness of the Frenchman or German who expects his government to feed him when hungry, clothe him when naked, to prescribe when his child may be born and when he may die, and, in time, to regulate every act of humanity from the cradle to the tomb, including the manner in which he may seek future admission to paradise.”—Mark Twain
“Our problems are both acute and chronic, yet all we hear from those in positions of leadership are the same tired proposals for more government tinkering, more meddling and more control—all of which led us to this state in the first place... We must have the clarity of vision to see the difference between what is essential and what is merely desirable, and then the courage to bring our government back under control and make it acceptable to the people.”—Ronald Reagan
Sunday, September 23, 2007
- (1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
- (2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few...... And to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity."
- (3) "(We) ....can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."
- (4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own turf in order to create this common ground."
- (5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed."
- (6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched."
Now you might think these were the famous words of the Father of communism, Karl Marx...........and you would be on the right track in thinking so.....but you would be wrong...... These pearls of socialist/Marxist wisdom are from none other than our very own, home-grown Marxist......... Hillary Clinton!
More Hillary speak here.
Saturday, September 22, 2007
But then my first husband was German and my second was a mental case to start with. Well, come to think of it, maybe my first wasn't all that stable, either. He has married a third time. I've had my two and I think that second one cured me of "marriage." You know, a nine millimeter gun pressed to your chest is a definite cure-all.
_The so-called "white tree" at Jena High, often reported to be the domain of only white students, was nothing of the sort, according to teachers and school administrators; students of all races, they say, congregated under it at one time or another.
_Two nooses — not three — were found dangling from the tree. Beyond being offensive to blacks, the nooses were cut down because black and white students "were playing with them, pulling on them, jump-swinging from them, and putting their heads through them," according to a black teacher who witnessed the scene.
_There was no connection between the September noose incident and December attack, according to Donald Washington, an attorney for the U.S. Justice Department in western Louisiana, who investigated claims that these events might be race-related hate crimes.
_The three youths accused of hanging the nooses were not suspended for just three days — they were isolated at an alternative school for about a month, and then given an in-school suspension for two weeks.
_The six-member jury that convicted Bell was, indeed, all white. However, only one in 10 people in LaSalle Parish is African American, and though black residents were selected randomly by computer and summoned for jury selection, none showed up.
. . . videotapes seized from one charity committee showing kids dressed up as Hamas fighters or expressing a love of martyrdom and referring to their own blood.
Friday, September 21, 2007
The following is a description (slightly modified) from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.
As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness.
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs [Europe, Australia, USA and Japan]. Six percent of US prison inmates are Muslim. Like any other minority, they won’t integrate, but work to build their own separate community.
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. South Africa's Muslim population is 2%, but they control 35% of the businesses, a large percentage of the banks and have five Cabinet seats while Christians (77% of the population) have none.
They will push for the introduction of halaal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves (along with threats for failure to comply).
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia; Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world, but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. (Ei: car-burnings in France last October.) Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats.
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning (India, Mindanao, Philippines).
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare [Indonesia].
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya (infidel tax). (Sudan, Kosovo, Lebanon and Egypt).
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide [Western Papua (New Guinea), Iran, Biafra, Turkey and North Nigeria].
100% will usher in the peace of "Dar-es-Salaam" - House of Peace - as in Saudi Arabia, Libya and Yemen.
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Where is the Church in Jena? According to Mr. Martin, the white preachers refused to meet with the black preachers to talk about reconciliation!
How does any person claim to be "Christ like" aka "Christian" and then not follow His Commandments, of which there are only two: To love the Lord your God with all your heart and soul and mind and to love your neighbor as you love yourself. Why is that so hard if the neighbor has a different skin tone?
A long time ago, my parents changed Churches. At the time I was young and was not given any explanation. We just stopped going to one Lutheran Church and started attending another. It was only a few years ago that I found out why. As it happened, another Lutheran Church a few blocks away had burned down. My Dad attended a Board meeting and asked the Board to extend to that congregation an invitation to attend services with us at our Church. (His thinking was: Why are there two Lutheran Churches so close together duplicating services?) The Board denied the request. The reason? I don't know what's in the minutes, but the other Church was made up of blacks. When the Board voted against having the black Lutheran Church worship with us, they unknowingly lost the support of my parents and we never attended that Lutheran Church again.
I was raised to accept people as people. Color never mattered.
Another true story. A number of years ago my Doctor sent me to Gwinnett Medical Center to have a mammogram. I kept the appointment and exchanged my top for the hospital gown (opening to the front), took off my jewelry, and walked into the room. The Radiologist/Nurse told me to place my breast on the little tray, which I did. She then did the absolute strangest thing I've ever had happen to me. She asked if she could touch me to place my breast properly. I looked at her like "Why Are You Asking Me This?" So I said, "Sure, but why did you ask?" She said that sometimes women wouldn't allow her to touch them, "because, you know . . . I'm black."
I looked at her and blurted out "You are a nurse, right?" She said "Yes." I said "So what does your being black have to do with your making my mammogram?" She said that she didn't want to make me feel uncomfortable. I told her that her skin color was the last thing that would make me feel uncomfortable, but if she wasn't really qualified to make the mammogram, I would feel uncomfortable. She assured me she was qualified and we completed the mammogram.
I have never forgotten that incident. It happened probably 12 or 13 years ago. I still laugh when I think about it. What does color have to do with anything? Who the heck cares about the color of someone's skin? I'm more concerned with "are you qualified to perform this procedure/job/activity?"
Unfortunately not everyone was blessed to have parents like mine and to be raised "color-blind." I'm a snob when it comes to education and grades, but I don't care what color your skin is and I don't see how skin color is relevant to much of anything. Who cares?
Apparently a LOT of people care. How distressing to know that there are small minded people after all this time. How sad for the people in Jena, LA, who never learned to "love others as they love themselves." Pity the poverty in the hearts and souls of their preachers that they failed Christ Jesus for so many years.
Saint Matthew 22: 35 And one of them, a doctor of the law, asking him, tempting him: 36 Master, which is the greatest commandment in the law? 37 Jesus said to him: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with thy whole heart, and with thy whole soul, and with thy whole mind. 38 This is the greatest and the first commandment. 39 And the second is like to this: Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. 40 On these two commandments dependeth the whole law and the prophets.
Saint Matthew 7:21 Not every one that saith to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven: but he that doth the will of my Father who is in heaven, he shall enter into the kingdom of heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day: Lord, Lord, have not we prophesied in thy name, and cast out devils in thy name, and done many miracles in thy name? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, you that work iniquity. 24 Every one therefore that heareth these my words, and doth them, shall be likened to a wise man that built his house upon a rock, 25 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and they beat upon that house, and it fell not, for it was founded on a rock.
26 And every one that heareth these my words, and doth them not, shall be like a foolish man that built his house upon the sand, 27 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and they beat upon that house, and it fell, and great was the fall thereof.
Thank you for contacting me regarding S. 774, the "Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act." It is good to hear from you.
S. 774 was introduced on March 6, 2007, and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. This legislation would allow illegal aliens to receive post-secondary educational benefits from the state in which they reside. It would also adjust an illegal alien's status to permanent legal resident status as long as they entered the U.S. before their sixteenth birthday and have been in the country for at least 5 years. Should this legislation come before the Senate, I will not support it.
If you would like to receive timely email alerts regarding the latest congressional actions and my weekly e-newsletter, please sign up via my web site at: www.chambliss.senate.gov . Please let me know whenever I may be of assistance.
My response to him AND copy sent to Senator Dodd of Connecticut:
MIAMI -- Two brothers from Kendall who face deportation back to their native Columbia have been given more time to fight for a chance to a stay in the United States permanently.
Juan and Alex Gomez will be able to remain in the United States until March 2009 because of a private bill filed on their behalf by Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut. Dodd, who is running for president, supports the "DREAM Act," which would allow children of illegal immigrants who grew up in the United States to remain in the country legally by attending college or serving in the military.
Juan thanked Dodd saying, "this is a humanitarian act."
Juan, 18, and Alex, 19, are being threatened with deportation after their parents overstayed their tourist visa by 16 years and ignored a 2002 order to leave after losing an appeal.
The boys' parents, however, are still facing deportation.
~~~~~~~~~~~So the DREAM Act is still alive according to Senator Dodd? Why is a Connecticut Senator so involved in a Florida case?
This family knowingly stayed beyond their Tourist Visa. The children should NOT have even been allowed to register for school. They have used resources that rightfully belong to US Citizens. Will they now take scholarship and grant monies that should go to a US Citizen? Will they stay in a dormitory or student housing while a US Citizen is denied?
They may be "nice" people, but they lost their appeal to stay and they should have returned home in 2002. The Court should have deported them the minute they lost their appeal. What is wrong with people that they think the United States should babysit and raise every illegal alien who wants to stay here?
If Senator Dodd wants to help this family then they can come live with him and because he'll be harboring illegal aliens, he will then be breaking the law and will not be able to attempt to run for President, much less Senator.
I'm sending a copy of this email to Senator Dodd. I am livid. He has broken the law by encouraging illegal aliens to remain in the United States after they have been ordered to leave. It has nothing to do with anything but having the USofA be a Nation Of Laws.
This family should have returned home and applied for green cards. Rules, regulations and laws are made to be followed. Everyone follows the rules and everything works out. People who break the rules, regulations and laws should be prosecuted for what they are -- lawbreakers and criminals. It is a crime to enter the USofA illegally. It's not as if we do not have a legal procedure for people who want to come to the USofA. If we didn't have legal means to come here, and if this family was persecuted in their home Country, the situation would be different. But that's not the case. This family decided to break the law and failed to return home. They broke the law when they registered their children in public school where each child is supposed to have a valid United States birth certificate or a green card and a Social Security number. The school is at fault here, too.
And how has this family been supporting themselves? Is someone working? Where and how? They have no Social Security numbers! Who hired whom and why are the employers not being prosecuted for breaking the law? How did the employers report earnings and taxes?
Waaay too many laws broken for this family and for 12 to 21 Million other Illegal Aliens sucking the resources out of the United States.
Pass a private law and send this family back to their home now! A Judge has already ordered them home. These children do not qualify for anything that a US Citizen rightfully qualifies for, no matter how long they've lived in the USofA. They are still illegal aliens. They are fraudulent foreigners. They do not belong in the USofA and they have no right to use up resources that rightfully belong to US Citizens.
Still Livid over this situation,
Well, no, it's not innocuous. The Liberty Counsel presented a paper to Congress entitled THE IMPACT OF HATE CRIMES LAWS UPON RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS AND CLERGY written by two attorneys: Erik W. Stanley, Esq. and Mathew D. Staver, Esq.
“The religious organizations and clergy that would be impacted by this Bill are those who have a sincere belief that homosexuality, lesbianism, transgenderism and bisexuality violate their religious tenets.” This bill “puts Christians in the crosshairs and mandates that our society accept the very radical notion that one’s gender is not a matter of birth but of personal choice.” This bill is Speaker Pelosi's attempt to satisfy her homosexual supporters by ushering in radical homosexual rights which will lead to the criminalization of Christianity, as well as Islam, Baha’i, Buddhism, Scientology and Zoroastrianism.
What exactly IS a Hate Crime? “Hate Crimes” are too loosely defined and legislation cannot adequately address every “hate crime.” Is it not a “hate crime” for a school in Jena, LA, to have a “White Tree” where only white students are allowed to congregate? Is it not a “hate crime” for Muslims living in the USofA to reject the laws of the United States in favor of Sharia laws? Is it not a “hate crime” for Speaker Pelosi to favor homosexuals over Christians?
And the reason Speaker Pelosi wants the ENDA bill passed swiftly? She will be attending a gala dinner with homosexual activists in October.
And you thought that Christianity and Islam were totally opposed to each other? One thing agreed upon is that homosexuality is aberrant behavior.
So, my questions are:
1) How do you define "hate crime"?
2) What is the criteria which turns any crime into a "hate crime"?
3) Can a negative word or thought be considered a "hate crime"?
4) Should a person who speaks negatively be charged with a "hate crime" and be prosecuted?
4) Does the USofA need Federal Legislation to define every "hate crime"?
Time Magazine hired Dan Hill, a recognized authority on facial coding to look into each candidate's eyes for clues to their innermost thoughts. I think what you read will be very interesting and may give you an insight into who each candidate might be like if elected President of the USofA.
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
It appears to me that this burqua clad woman may not be a woman at all. My suspicions are based on shoulder shape and hidden hands. Burquas should be outlawed until the USofA leaves Iraq to the Iraqis. How can our Soldiers know for sure that the person beneath the burqua is truly a woman and is not wearing a "bomb vest?" To me the child appears to be "crying" on cue and not all that much distraught.
I'm just askin' --- just askin'.
"GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
"Press One for English."
"Press Two to disconnect until you learn to speak English."
"Thank you and have a good day."
I am shocked to see your name on NumbersUSA's list of Senators who are declining to pledge to vote NO on the DREAM Act Amnesty. (http://www.numbersusa.com/hottopic/dreamactnovotes.html)
The USofA, We the People, do not need another "fraudulent foreigner" bill. We just need the laws you and your previous Federally elected officials have already passed to be upheld.
This "immigration" talk is incorrect. Immigrants are people who come to the USofA through lawful and legal channels.
The Illegal Aliens or Fraudulent Foreigners who come to the USofA without benefit of any legal paperwork do not deserve or require any benefits which in effect say to them that they "really didn't mean to break the law, because if the USofA didn't have that law, they wouldn't have 'broken' it."
If you want to pass an "Illegal Alien Reform Act" then use the same form as Mexico uses for people who wish to relocate their citizenship to Mexico.
Otherwise, Build The Fence! Pardon and Release Ramos and Compean! Deport Illegal Aliens!
Do not be cowed by the "it's not their fault" and the "but these people are hard workers" and the "the US was founded by immigrants" and the "it's the US's duty as a compassionate Country" and all the other unreasonable and irrational arguments directed at feelings instead of facts.
The facts are that Illegal Aliens are Fraudulent Foreigners and do not have any right to live in the USofA because they failed to follow the regulations for lawful entry. They are not the victims here. The USofA is the victim and they are the perpetrators.
Senator, please vote NO this week and next week on three measures that are being considered for the Defense Authorization bill or for a later bill this fall.
Vote NO on Amendment 2237 that would attach the Dream Act Amnesty.
Vote NO on any measure to increase H-1B visas and permanent greencards for foreign workers to take jobs from skilled American workers and students.
Vote NO on any attempt to increase H-2B visas for seasonal foreign workers to take jobs from America's most vulnerable workers.
As you know, the Defense bill is not an appropriation bill. Thus, if your opposition to including an amnesty in the bill delays passage of it, you will not be slowing down funding for our men and women in uniform.
Build The Fence! Pardon and Release Ramos and Compean! Deport Illegal Aliens!
Monday, September 17, 2007
"The law books say that crossing the border without permission is a misdemeanor. Other than that, it's not a crime," Giuliani said. "That's a question of law, not political rhetoric or political spinning or political positioning."
Excuse me? The Misdemeanor doesn't just "end" with the crossing of the border. The illegal alien (he's not an immigrant, he's a foreigner with no papers documenting lawful entry into any Country) also has to impersonate someone who has a valid Social Security Number in order to work, so, he steals someone else's or makes one up. He needs a vehicle, so if he doesn't have a "valid" (such as they are, since no background checks are completed in Mexico as they don't have the equipment to do so and have no intent to purchase same) Mexican driver's license (which means he knows nothing of USofA Transportation Laws), he has to obtain a US State driver's license (in most States) by impersonating a citizen which he discards after obtaining a vehicle so that he won't be arrested for using a fake ID. (He steals someone else's identity.) Maybe he pays some US Citizen who has befriended him to purchase the vehicle for him. And he is supposed to register the car and obtain auto insurance. He may steal a license plate or he may again impersonate a citizen and obtain a real license plate by forgery or have a friend get the tag for him. He usually does not purchase any vehicle insurance coverage -- if you doubt, check the reasons so many illegal aliens are ticketed by the Sheriff's office in your County.
The "cost" of illegal aliens in the USofA includes the use of infrastructure without paying taxes. Illegal aliens are stealing from the USofA. The cost of illegal foreigners in the USofA includes County and City school systems providing education for illegal alien children. ALL children are to have a Social Security Number to be enrolled in school, yet there are very few schools in this Country who follow the law and refuse to admit children who have no Social Security Number. In some areas, the children are given a "temporary identification number" similar to a Social Security Number which follows them throughout their school years and which I have seen, first hand, used by an illegal alien as a "Social Security Number" in order to obtain Social Services. These children are now both victims and perpetrators in collusion with their parent(s) and the school systems in perpetuating a FRAUD and costing the community thousands of dollars in illegally obtaining an education as if they were "entitled" to the same resources as any US Citizen (which they're not because they're foreigners with no legitimate reason for being in the United States of America).
And that is the bottom line. YES, illegal aliens are NOT immigrants. They are illegal foreigners with no legitimate reason for being in the United States. They have no legal right to use up space in the USofA that rightfully belongs to US Citizens.
When the USofA treats ALL it's Citizens equally, when there are no "ghettos" and no "gangs" to replace the family unit, when there are no under-educated US Citizens, when unemployed Citizens can obtain training and work, when employers pay US Citizens a "fair wage" and housing, food, and transportation costs do not use up over 75% of that income, when the United States of America has no one living under the poverty level, THEN and only then, can we accept more legal immigrants into this Country.
A non-US Citizen has no implied rights when he or she enters the USofA illegally. IN fact, by entering the USofA illegally, the non-US Citizen does not fall under the jurisdiction of any laws as they apply to US Citizens. Judges and the ACLU need a reality check. If Osama Bin Laden illegally entered the USofA, would the ACLU and some judges allow him all the rights of a US Citizen? The correct answer here is: NO. And that's also the correct answer for the 12 to 21 Million (or more) foreigners who have illegally entered and are living in the United States of America at the present time.
Reality Check time. Round them up and export them back to their home Countries. They have no right to any kind of "hearing" (fair or otherwise) because they do not belong here.
Yes, I'm fired up. I know some illegal aliens. They're nice people. But they don't belong in the United States of America. They belong back in their home Country of Mexico, Venezuela, etc.
Giuliani has it wrong. Unlawful foreigners do not belong here. They need to be returned to their home so that they can lawfully enter the USofA or they don't need to return.
From The Neshoba Democrat on the Web:
Copies of what is believed to be the only recording of then-Republican Presidential nominee Ronald Reagan's 1980 speech at the Fair has been donated to The Reagan Library and the Mississippi Department of Archives and History by a Neshoba County native.
Listening to this speech reminds me of how great it is to live in the United States of America and why we must preserve her sovereignty, our representative democracy and our way of life.
“[A]ll Americans should reflect upon the precious heritage of liberty under law passed on to us by our Founding Fathers. This heritage finds its most comprehensive expression in our Constitution. The framing of the Constitution was an arduous task accomplished in the spirit of cooperation and with dedication to the ideals of republican self-government and unalienable God-given human rights that gave transcendent meaning and inspiration to the American Revolution... The wisdom and foresight of the architects of the Constitution are manifest in the fact that it remains a powerful governing tool to the present day. Indeed, a great British statesman has called it ‘the most wonderful work ever struck off at a given time by the brain and purpose of man.’ For 200 years, people from other lands have come to the United States to participate in the great adventure in self-government begun in Philadelphia in 1787... [A]ll citizens should reread and study this great document and rededicate themselves to the ideals it enshrines.”—Ronald Reagan
Sunday, September 16, 2007
Read the story in The Washington Post.
The head of an al Qaeda-led group in Iraq has offered a $100,000 reward for the killing of a Swedish cartoonist for his drawing of Islam's Prophet Mohammad and threatened to attack major Swedish companies.
Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, leader of the self-styled Islamic State in Iraq, also offered $50,000 to anyone who killed the editor of the newspaper that published the drawing by Lars Vilks depicting the head of the Prophet on the body of a dog.
Hmmmm, what's old Abu going to say when he sees how many bloggers have spread this story and the cartoon all over the world via the Internet (invented by some guy named Albert Gore, Jr. -- the Internet, not Abu or the cartoon).
I'm not saying this is a photo of Abu Omar of Baghdad, but it may have some similarities.
Thursday, September 13, 2007
You just gave the "Democrat" response to President Bush's televised statement on Iraq. You claim you speak for us. Where did you get your information about what we think? Who decided for you what we want or what we think is best for the United States?
I am a voter. I am not aligned (yet) with any party. Sometimes I vote Democrat and sometimes Republican. We have a Democrat Sole Commissioner in my County in Georgia. I voted for him and I support him. I voted for Bill Clinton. I'm not just some backcountry uneducated old woman.
And you sir, cannot speak for me. You have listened to too many negative voices in the Democrat Party, in the Media and in Hollywood. These voices do not represent "we the people of the United States." We are not numbers in a poll. We want the War in Iraq to end, but end victoriously. We want our military to return home, not like the way the Vietnam Veterans were received. We want the military brought home to march down Broadway in New York City with bands and confetti and cheers.
So, sir, how can you make sure this occurs? You are responsible, along with your Democrat and Republican members of Congress to support the legislation that brings our military home victorious winners in the War in Iraq and the War on Terror.
Speaking of the War on Terror: The way to win in the War on Terror is to Build The Fence on our Southern Border with Mexico, to stop the building of the NAFTA highway, to deny access to US roads and highways to drivers who only have a Mexican driver's license or have no valid driver's license, and to deport all Illegal Aliens immediately. It will not cost billions of dollars to deport the 12 to 21 Million Illegals. Every State gives traffic tickets and fines people who drive without a valid driver's license (and some States require proof of insurance). All it takes is the arrest and immediate deportation of those men and women who have no valid driver's license. They can be deported along with their families if the adults have no valid license. The children must go with their parent(s) and can return to the US when they are old enough to decide which citizenship they desire. There is no reason to continue to keep "anchor babies" in the US when their parent(s) are sent back "home."
You say you want to end the War in Iraq? You can start by ending the Invasion of the United States by Illegal Aliens.
If the Democrats in Congress will Build The Fence on our Southern Border with Mexico, to stop the building of the NAFTA highway, deny access to US roads and highways to drivers who only have a Mexican driver's license or have no valid driver's license, and deport all Illegal Aliens immediately, not only will our Country be safer, but voters will unanimously vote Democrat in November 2008. And Congress can bring home our military troops in victory.
Some of you will jump up and state that I am aligned with Fred Thompson who is running for the Presidency as a Republican. While that is correct, I am not aligned with either the Democrat or the Republican Party. I am an Independent or Constitutionalist, but we don't align in Georgia, so I am being truthful.
Do I think that the Democrats will win in 2008 if Congress will Build The Fence on our Southern Border with Mexico, to stop the building of the NAFTA highway, deny access to US roads and highways to drivers who only have a Mexican driver's license or have no valid driver's license, and deport all Illegal Aliens immediately? YES, a thousand times, YES. Will I vote Democrat? Can't answer that yet. But I'll be leaning that way if the Democrats prove capable.
What about you?
We are United States Americans; citizens of a Sovereign Country. We have more of the world's wealth than perhaps we 'deserve' but I say "We Earned It." And I believe that you know what I just wrote (We Earned It) is true.
How did we earn it? We refused to become stagnated by any political or religious or lack thereof system. Democracy is a "work in progress" and not an "end to itself" (would someone explain that in American English to the Progressive and Liberal Democrats??) The United States grew into what she is today. Some of the growth we currently have seems questionable (maybe like a cancer?), yet as a Nation we continue to be Sovereign (unless the Illegal Aliens are given amnesty and unless the North American Union becomes a reality) and we continue to be a Nation of laws and a Nation which cares about others.
How did we earn it? We refused to accept any leadership which would carry us backwards intellectually, educationally, philosophically, or philanthropically. We rejected the idea of a "King/Queen" or a "Supreme Leader" or a "Caliphate" or a "god-like leader." We elect our officials. (Now, to be elected, many if not most elected or appointed officials end up compromising themselves for money because it costs a lot to get elected or be appointed in the Representative Democracy of the USofA. I'm saddened that this is true. It is a "fact" of life, however. What saddens me more is watching Congress vote themselves pay raises every year, pay for life, a non-SSA retirement system, etc. that puts them out of touch with the voting electorate.)
However, we have earned our status in the World and on the Earth and we should not be expected by anyone -- either a poorer populace in another Country or a liberal Congressperson -- to agree to share our wealth. Especially to share our wealth without any accountability. We have to put up with Congressional spending without accountability and that's about all the voters can tolerate. In fact, it's more than most of us can tolerate. We don't like seeing US dollars spent on people or in Countries without any limits or proof that the money is being spent as directed.
Are we tired of the War on Terror? Are we tired of the War in Iraq? Are we tired of the War in Afghanistan?
Yes, but not nearly as tired as we are of elected officials taking advantage of their office to line their pockets, to hide their illegal or extralegal activities, to lie, to cheat, to steal for their own benefit. And then to turn on Legal Citizens of the United States and try to manipulate us to their agendas.
The Democrats cannot hide the truth about Norman Hsu. There is no way to "murder him off" in a Democrat fashion. The guilty parties have no where to hide.
We have earned our wealth and we want a complete and truthful explanation from the Democrats about Norman Hsu's donations to them. All Four Million plus.
"We love death. The United States loves life. That is the big difference between us." – Osama bin Laden
"I have been made victorious through terror." Muhammad, founder of Muhammadism now called Islam (Submit or Die)