Tom Plate states:
These students were not killed by a Korean, they were killed by a 9 mm handgun and a .22-caliber handgun.
Now, excuse me if I appear confused, but I've never seen a 9mm handgun get up out of its case, load itself and then take aim and fire at a human being. Has Tom Plate? If so, do we need to concern ourselves with his mental health? Tom Plate was robbed at gun point recently. Perhaps he does need to sit down with a counselor and work through this trauma.
Ted Nugent states:
Evil is as evil does, and laws disarming guaranteed victims make evil people very, very happy. Shame on us.
Already spineless gun control advocates are squawking like chickens with their tiny-brained heads chopped off, making political hay over this most recent, devastating Virginia Tech massacre, when in fact it is their own forced gun-free zone policy that enabled the unchallenged methodical murder of 32 people.
Thirty-two people dead on a U.S. college campus pursuing their American Dream, mowed-down over an extended period of time by a lone, non-American gunman in illegal possession of a firearm on campus in defiance of a zero-tolerance gun law.
Had there not been a 'gun-free zone' at Virginia Tech, someone legally carrying a firearm could have disabled Cho Seung-Hui, possibly before he even got one shot fired. It is people such as Tom Plate and those who support the Brady Act who are indirectly responsible for Cho Seung-Hui's rampage with a gun. There were plenty of students available to stop Cho, but none of them were allowed to carry their guns on campus!
Gun free zones do not protect the innocent, they merely mean that the innocents are targets of someone with an evil mind and loaded firearm.